Salt Ltd is a Government Business Entity that would like to acquire 100% of a viable private company. It has obtained the following draft financial statements for two companies, Light Ltd and Favour Ltd. They operate in the same industry, and their managements have indicated they would be receptive to a takeover.

Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31 December 2017:

Description Light Ltd (GH¢’000) Favour Ltd (GH¢’000)
Revenue 12,000 20,500
Cost of sales (10,500) (18,000)
Gross profit 1,500 2,500
Operating expenses (240) (500)
Finance costs (210) (600)
Profit before tax 1,050 1,400
Income tax expense (150) (400)
Profit for the year 900 1,000
Dividends paid 250 700

Statements of Financial Position as at 31 December 2017:

Description Light Ltd (GH¢’000) Favour Ltd (GH¢’000)
Assets
Non-current assets:
Freehold factory 4,400
Owned plant 5,000 2,200
Leased plant 5,300
Total non-current assets 9,400 7,500
Current assets:
Inventory 2,000 3,600
Trade receivables 2,400 3,700
Bank 600
Total current assets 5,000 7,300
Total assets 14,400 14,800
Equity and Liabilities
Equity shares of GH¢1 each 2,000 2,000
Property revaluation reserve 900
Retained earnings 2,600 800
Total equity 5,500 2,800
Non-current liabilities
Finance lease obligations 3,200
7% loan notes 3,000
10% loan notes 3,000
Deferred tax 600 100
Government grants 1,200
Total non-current liabilities 4,800 6,300
Current liabilities
Bank overdraft 1,200
Trade payables 3,100 3,800
Government grants 400
Finance lease obligations 500
Taxation 600 200
Total current liabilities 4,100 5,700
Total equity and liabilities 14,400 14,800

Notes:

i. Both companies operate from the same premises.
ii. Additional details of the two companies’ plant are:

Description Light Ltd (GH¢’000) Favour Ltd (GH¢’000)
Owned plant – Historical cost 8,000 10,000
Leased plant – Original fair value 7,500

There were no disposals of plant during the year by either company.

iii. The interest rate implicit within Favour Ltd’s finance leases is 7.5% per annum. For the purpose of calculating ROCE and gearing, all finance lease obligations are treated as long-term interest-bearing borrowings.

Required:
Assess the relative financial performance and financial position of Light Ltd and Favour Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2017 to inform the directors of Salt Ltd in their acquisition decision. Your analysis should focus on profitability, liquidity, and gearing.
(15 marks)

Appendix – Ratio Calculations

Ratio Formula Light Ltd Favour Ltd
Gross profit margin Gross profit / Revenue 12.5% 12.2%
Operating profit margin Profit before interest and tax / Revenue 10.5% 9.8%
ROCE Profit before interest and tax / (Equity + Long-term borrowings) 14.8% 21.0%
Return on equity (ROE) Profit after tax / Equity 16.4% 35.7%
Pre-tax ROE Profit before tax / Equity 19.1% 50.0%
Net asset turnover Revenue / (Total assets – Total liabilities) 2.2 times 7.3 times
Current ratio Current assets / Current liabilities 1.2:1 1.3:1
Acid test ratio (Current assets – Inventory) / Current liabilities 0.73:1 0.65:1
Interest cover Profit before interest and tax / Finance costs 6.0 times 3.3 times
Inventory holding period Inventory / Cost of sales * 365 days 70 days 73 days
Trade receivables collection period Trade receivables / Revenue * 365 days 73 days 66 days
Trade payables payment period Trade payables / Cost of sales * 365 days 108 days 77 days
Gearing ratio Long-term debt / (Long-term debt + Equity) * 100 35.3% 70.5%
Dividend cover Profit after tax / Dividends paid 3.6 times 1.4 times

Analysis of Profitability, Liquidity, and Gearing:

  • Profitability:
    Favour Ltd has a higher return on capital employed (ROCE) of 21%, compared to 14.8% for Light Ltd, driven by a more efficient use of its assets. However, Light Ltd has a slightly better operating profit margin at 10.5% versus 9.8% for Favour Ltd, indicating slightly more efficient operations despite lower overall profitability.
  • Liquidity:
    Both companies have similar liquidity ratios, but Favour Ltd has a higher current ratio (1.3:1) compared to Light Ltd (1.2:1). However, Favour Ltd’s significant bank overdraft and lower acid test ratio (0.65:1 compared to Light Ltd’s 0.73:1) may raise concerns about its short-term financial stability.
  • Gearing:
    Favour Ltd’s gearing is much higher at 70.5% compared to Light Ltd’s 35.3%, indicating a higher reliance on debt financing. Favour Ltd’s interest cover is also lower at 3.3 times compared to Light Ltd’s 6 times, suggesting higher financial risk for Favour Ltd in terms of meeting its interest obligations.

Conclusion:
While Favour Ltd shows better profitability and asset utilization, its high gearing and reliance on debt make it a riskier investment compared to Light Ltd, which has more stable liquidity and lower financial risk.

(15 marks)