Topic: Performance analysis

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

MA – Nov 2024 – L2- Q1b – Return on Investment (ROI)

Computation of ROI for different one-off transactions and advice on whether they should be undertaken.

Dondo LTD is a manufacturing company based in Nsawam. The following data represents the budgeted performance of Dondo LTD for the year 2025:

Amount (GH¢’000)
Profit 660
Plant and equipment (net of depreciation) 1,560
Working capital 750

Dondo LTD is considering undertaking the following separate one-off transactions:

  1. A cash discount of GH¢16,000 will be offered to its customers annually. This will, on average, reduce the trade receivables figure by GH¢60,000.
  2. An increase in average inventories by GH¢80,000 throughout the year. The increased inventory level is expected to increase sales, resulting in GH¢30,000 increased contribution per annum.
  3. At the beginning of the year, the company will buy a plant worth GH¢360,000. This is expected to reduce operating costs by GH¢105,000. The plant has a five-year useful life with nil residual value.

Required:

i) Compute the ROI for each of the one-off transactions above. 
ii) Advise Dondo LTD on whether the above one-off transactions should be carried out.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2024 – L2- Q1b – Return on Investment (ROI)"

FR – May 2021 – L2 – Q5 – Performance Analysis

Analyze profitability, liquidity, and financial stability of Pepeyoyo Limited based on provided ratios.

You are the Chief Accountant of Jolmarg Nigeria Limited. Pepeyoyo Limited is a competitor in the same industry as Jolmarg and has been operating for the past 20 years.

The following is the result of Pepeyoyo Limited for the last three years ended December 31:

Ratios 2016 2017 2018
Gross profit margin (%) 34 34.4 35.4
ROCE (%) 21.1 21.5 17.8
Net profit margin (%) 11.9 12.4 11.4
Asset turnover (times) 1.78 1.73 1.56
Gearing ratio (%) 15.6 24.3 23.6
Debt ratio (%) 18.5 32.0 30.9
Interest cover (times) 16.7 8.1 5.5
Current ratio 3:1 2.8:1 2.7:1
Quick ratio 1.2:1 1.1:1 1.1:1
Receivable collection period (days) 46 52 64
Inventory turnover period (days) 158 171 182
Payable payment period (days) 35 42 46

Required:

a. Write a report to the finance director of Jolmarg Nigeria Limited analyzing the performance (profitability, liquidity, and long-term financial stability) of Pepeyoyo Limited based on the information available.
(10 Marks)

b. Identify FIVE areas which require further investigation, including references to other pieces of information which would complement your analysis of the performance of Pepeyoyo Limited.
(10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2021 – L2 – Q5 – Performance Analysis"

FR – July 2023 – L2 – Q4 – Performance Analysis

Assess the financial performance of Besease Ltd using financial ratios and prepare a report for the board of directors.

Besease Ltd won two prestigious awards in 2020 despite the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Board of Directors seeks to assess the company’s performance for the year ended 31 December 2021 in comparison to 2020.

Below are the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2021:

Statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December

2021 (GH¢) 2020 (GH¢)
Revenue 7,315,927 6,184,754
Cost of sales (4,322,986) (3,441,339)
Gross profit 2,992,941 2,743,415
Other income 330,812 280,832
Administrative expenses (2,511,179) (2,648,987)
Operating profit 812,574 375,260
Finance cost (496,913) (174,872)
Profit before tax 315,661 200,388
Taxation (188,621) (30,700)
Profit for the year 127,040 169,688

Statement of financial position as at 31 December

2021 (GH¢) 2020 (GH¢)
Non-current assets
Property, Plant & Equipment 9,224,988 5,102,799
Intangible assets 35,824 33,350
Investments 36,629 36,629
Total non-current assets 9,297,441 5,172,778
Current assets
Inventories 2,878,337 1,329,279
Trade receivables 1,875,594 2,246,747
Cash and bank balances 527,412 372,081
Total current assets 5,281,343 3,948,107
Total assets 14,578,784 9,120,885
Equity & Liabilities
Equity
Share capital 217,467 217,467
Retained earnings 1,289,140 1,162,100
Credit reserve 826,528 1,102,037
Total equity 2,333,135 2,481,604
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing loans 6,708,598 2,800,223
Deferred taxation 187,624 186,304
Total non-current liabilities 6,896,222 2,986,527
Current liabilities
Trade payables 1,257,693 1,550,466
Taxation 118,337 101,391
Other payables 2,993,667 1,021,167
Accrued expenses 979,730 979,730
Total current liabilities 5,349,427 3,652,754
Total equity & liabilities 14,578,784 9,120,885

The Finance Manager has selected the following performance ratios:
i) Return on capital employed (capital employed = interest-bearing debt + shareholders’ equity) (%)
ii) Return on equity (%)
iii) Acid test ratio (times)
iv) Debt-to-equity ratio
v) Interest cover ratio (times)

Required:
Write a report to the Board of Directors assessing the comparative performance of Besease Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2021 using the given ratios.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FR – July 2023 – L2 – Q4 – Performance Analysis"

MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement

Calculate EVA for Vilagio Engineering for 2021 and 2022 and comment on its performance.

Vilagio Engineering (VE) is a listed company manufacturing pumps and valves for use in the irrigation sector. The CEO has tasked you to assess Vilagio’s performance using Economic Value Added. Below is an extract of their financial statements.

Income Statement extract for the year:

Additional information:
i) Capital employed at the end of 2020 amounted to GH¢350 million.
ii) VE had non-capitalised leases valued at GH¢16 million in each of the years 2020 to 2022. Ignore amortisation calculations.
iii) VE’s pre-tax cost of debt was estimated to be 9% in 2021 and 10% in 2022.
iv) VE’s cost of equity was estimated to be 15% in 2021 and 17% in 2022.
v) The target capital structure is 70% equity, 30% debt.
vi) The rate of taxation is 30% in both 2021 and 2022.
vii) Economic depreciation amounted to GH¢64 million in 2021 and GH¢72 million in 2022. These amounts were equal to the depreciation used for tax purposes and depreciation charged in the income statements.
viii) Interest payable amounted to GH¢6 million in 2021 and GH¢8 million in 2022.
ix) Other non-cash expenses amounted to GH¢20 million per year in both 2021 and 2022.

Required:
a) Estimate the Economic Value Added (EVA) for Vilagio Engineering for both 2021 and 2022, and comment on the company’s performance.
b) State THREE (3) advantages and TWO (2) disadvantages of EVA.
c) Explain the relationship between EVA and Net Present Value (NPV).

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement"

MA – Mar 2024 – L2 – Q3b – Performance analysis

This question explains the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM) that improve operational processes in an organization.

Total Quality Management (TQM) is a management framework based on the belief that an organisation can build long-term success by having all its members—from low-level workers to its highest-ranking executives—focus on improving quality and delivering customer satisfaction.

Required:
Explain THREE (3) principles of TQM that improve operational processes in organizations.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Mar 2024 – L2 – Q3b – Performance analysis"

MA – May 2018 – L2 – Q2a – Performance analysis

Analyze a survey comparing attitudes towards Japanese and German cars based on service, economy, reliability, and comfort.

Diligence Research Ltd, a research and advocacy company, has undertaken an attitude survey of recent buyers of particular brands of cars in Ghana. As part of this study, recent buyers of Japanese cars and recent buyers of German cars were asked to agree or disagree with a number of statements. They were asked to choose only one out of the four options and indicate whether they agree or disagree. One of the summary tables from the survey is shown below.

Agree Disagree
Japan cars are:
Easy to get serviced 65 35
Economical 81 19
Reliable 76 24
Comfortable 69 31
German cars are:
Easy to get serviced 32 68
Economical 61 39
Reliable 74 26
Comfortable 85 15

Required:
Analyse the above data highlighting the most significant features of these data. Illustrate your analysis with tables.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2018 – L2 – Q2a – Performance analysis"

MA – Nov 2017 – L2 – Q1b – Performance analysis

Identify and explain five areas of relevance for management to ensure short and long-term profitability and survival of corporate institutions.

b) The traditional methods of measuring performance of sub-units to achieve goal congruence include divisional profit, Return on Investment, Residual Income and Transfer pricing. These profit based measures do not reveal all about the long term survival of corporate institutions.

Required: Identify and explain FIVE areas of relevance that should engage the attention of management to ensure both short and long term profitability and survival.

(10 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2017 – L2 – Q1b – Performance analysis"

MA – July 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Performance analysis

This question involves explaining the controllability principle, calculating controllable profit, ROI, and RI, and analyzing the performance of two divisions.

Kenkah Ltd provides buffer storage for many companies throughout the country. The company has two divisions, namely Abura and Keta. Each division is autonomous and makes its own long-term investment decisions.

Kenkah Ltd measures the performance of its divisions using Return on Investment (ROI), calculated using controllable profit and average divisional net assets. The company has a cost of capital of 12% but a targeted ROI of 18%. The divisional managers’ annual bonus is determined by the extent to which the ROI earned by the division exceeds the target.

At the beginning of the year, the two divisions, Abura and Keta, bought assets worth GH¢12.5 million and GH¢18.2 million respectively. The assets have a five-year life span with no residual value. The company uses the straight-line depreciation method. The other assets are being controlled by the head office.

Over the years, Kenkah Ltd has used ROI in evaluating the performance of managers. However, to discourage dysfunctional behavior, Kenkah Ltd is considering introducing Residual Income (RI) as a performance measure. Like ROI, RI is calculated using controllable profit and average divisional assets.

The current year’s draft operating statement is shown below:

Abura (GH¢000) Keta (GH¢000)
Sales 15,350 17,020
Less controllable Variable Cost 7,505 8,950
Contribution 7,845 8,070
Less Fixed Cost [i) & ii)] 6,335 6,910
Profit 1,510 1,160

Additional Information:
i) Included in fixed costs are the current year depreciation charges of GH¢3,125,000 and GH¢4,550,000 for division Abura and Keta, respectively. Twenty percent (20%) of the depreciation cost in each division is from assets owned and controlled by the head office.
ii) Head office allocates some of its overhead costs to the two divisions using activity-based costing. These costs have been included in the fixed costs and amounted to GH¢210,000 and GH¢230,000 for Abura and Keta, respectively.
iii) The Management Accountant stated at a recent board meeting that “Responsibility accounting is based on the application of the controllability principle.” Hence, he would resist any attempt by management to deviate from this basic principle.

Required:
a) Explain the “controllability principle” and why its application is difficult in practice.
(4 marks)

b) Calculate the current year controllable profit for both divisions of Kenkah Ltd.
(4 marks)

c) Calculate the current year ROI for each of the two divisions of Kenkah Ltd.
(3 marks)

d) Calculate the current year RI for each of the two divisions of Kenkah Ltd.
(4 marks)

e) Discuss the performance of the two divisions for the year.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – July 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Performance analysis"

MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q3a – Performance Analysis, Other Aspects of Performance Measurement

Identify and explain the four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard.

a) The aim of a balanced scorecard is to provide a comprehensive framework for translating a company’s strategic objectives into a coherent set of performance measures. It allows managers to look at the business from four different perspectives.

Required: Identify and explain these FOUR (4) perspectives.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2020 – L2 – Q3a – Performance Analysis, Other Aspects of Performance Measurement"

MA – May 2020 – L2 – Q1 – Performance Analysis

Analyze and discuss VAR's performance under financial performance, internal efficiency, and external effectiveness for the year ended 31 December 2016.

Volta Advisory Ltd (VAR) began trading on 1 January 2014. It specializes in the provision of expert advice to clients in accountancy, taxation, and regulatory compliance. It has a team of professional advisors, each specializing in one of these three areas of advice.

VAR has a target for delivering its services to clients promptly. From the time the client asks for advice, VAR undertakes to provide a formal report to the client within 10 working days. The following information relates to the financial year ended 31 December 2016.

i) The professional advisors are budgeted to work 220 days each year. They charge GH¢1,400 per day to new clients and GH¢1,200 to established clients.

ii) As a marketing measure intended to win new business, the advisors also give consultations to potential clients on a ‘no fee’ basis. These consultations, which are budgeted to take one day each, are accounted for as business development costs in the marketing budget.

iii) The professional advisors are also required to attend some ‘workshops’ with new clients who are having difficulties with implementing the advice that they have been given by VAR. These workshops, which are also given on a ‘no fee’ basis, are budgeted to last two days.

iv) VAR also has a help desk to provide client support. It responds to telephone and e-mail inquiries from all new and established clients.

v) The team of professional advisors is exactly 50. It is a policy of VAR to limit the team to 50, regardless of the volume of demand for its services.

vi) All professional advisors are paid a salary of GH¢100,000 per year. In addition, they are entitled to share equally in an annual bonus. The bonus is 50% of the amount by which fee income generated exceeds budget minus the revenue foregone as a result of having to give workshops for clients. This revenue foregone is assessed at a notional daily rate of GH¢1,200 per advisor/day.

vii) Operating expenses of the business, excluding salaries of the advisors, were GH¢3,100,000 in 2016. The budget for these expenses was GH¢2,800,000.

Other information

Budget 2016 Actual 2016
Professional advisors, by category:
Accounting 15 10
Tax 20 20
Compliance 15 20
Enquiries about seeking new advice:
New clients 2,600 2,200
Established clients 4,000 3,700
Number of chargeable client days:
New clients 2,600 2,750
Established clients 5,100 5,500
Average client days per job 4 4
Mix of chargeable client days:
Accounting 1,155 1,650
Tax 1,540 3,300
Compliance 1,155 3,300

The following are actual results for each of the three years 2014-2016:

2014 2015 2016
Number of clients 160 248 347
Number of complaints from clients 50 75 95
Number of accounts in dispute 10 7 5
Support desk: percentage of calls resolved 86% 94% 97%
Percentage of jobs completed within 10 days 90% 95% 98%
Average time to complete a job (days) 12.6 10.7 9.5
Chargeable client days 7,200 7,750 8,250
Number of consultations (business development) 50 100 150
Number of workshops given 110 135 165
Revenue (GH¢000) 8,920 9,740 ?
Net profit (GH¢000) 1,740 1,940 ?

Required: Using the information provided, analyze and discuss the performance of VAR for the year to 31 December 2016, under the following headings:

a) Financial performance and competitiveness;
b) Internal efficiency;
c) External effectiveness.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2020 – L2 – Q1 – Performance Analysis"

MA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1b – Divisional performance, Performance analysis

Evaluate the impact of a new investment on a division’s Return on Investment, Residual Income, and manager’s bonus.

b) Peah is a divisional manager of Monrovia Ltd. He is paid a bonus of 5% on the division’s residual income after charging the bonus. The division is currently considering an additional investment of GH¢200,000 with 10 years useful life but nil residual value. The investment is expected to yield a profit after depreciation of GH¢51,600. This will augment the existing capital employed of GH¢1,050,000 that currently offers GH¢264,400 profit after depreciation annually. The company’s policy is to accept investment projects that provide a return of at least 22%.

Required: i) Calculate the Return on Investment and Residual Incomes of the division before considering the new investment. (2 ½ marks)
ii) Advise the division on whether the new investment should be taken or not. (2 ½ marks)
iii) What will be the percentage change in the bonus of Peah if the new investment is added to the division’s existing operations? (3 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1b – Divisional performance, Performance analysis"

MA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1a – Performance analysis, Introduction to management accounting

Discuss problems associated with performance measurement of not-for-profit organizations and components of value for money criteria.

a) Generally, evaluating not-for-profit organisations’ performance is difficult but can be managed when ‘value for money’ criteria is used.
Required:
i) Explain FOUR (4) problems associated with performance measurement of not-for-profit organisations. (6 marks)
ii) Explain the THREE (3) main components of ‘value for money criteria’ and their usefulness to not-for-profit organisations. (6 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2021 – L2 – Q1a – Performance analysis, Introduction to management accounting"

MA – April 2022 – L2 – Q1c – Performance analysis

Explain the different types of benchmarking relevant to the CEO of Gyakie Ltd.

Gyakie currently faces tough competition with the major players in its market. To secure or increase its market position, the CEO has suggested a benchmarking exercise, although he has little knowledge in benchmarking exercises.

Required:

Explain the meaning of the following types of benchmarking to the CEO:

i) Internal benchmarking (2 marks)

ii) Competitive benchmarking (2 marks)

iii) Functional benchmarking (2 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – April 2022 – L2 – Q1c – Performance analysis"

MA – May 2017 – L2 – Q1c – Performance analysis, Other aspects of performance measurement

Explain cost center, revenue/profit center, and investment center in terms of their managerial objectives and performance measurement indexes.

Explain in brief the following terminologies as used in performance evaluation, highlighting their managerial objectives and the performance measurement indexes:

i) Cost centre
ii) Revenue/profit centre
iii) Investment centre

(6 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2017 – L2 – Q1c – Performance analysis, Other aspects of performance measurement"

MA – May 2016 – L2 – Q1b – Performance Analysis, Other Aspects of Performance Measurement

Explain methods used in measuring performance and identify qualities of good performance measurement criteria.

Performance Management aims to establish how well something or somebody is doing in relation to a plan. Explain TWO methods used in measuring performance and identify FOUR qualities of a good performance measurement criteria.

(8 marks)

 

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – May 2016 – L2 – Q1b – Performance Analysis, Other Aspects of Performance Measurement"

MA – Nov 2016 – L2 – Q4b – Performance analysis

Describe the balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement, highlighting its components and importance.

Describe the balanced scorecard approach to performance measurement. (5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2016 – L2 – Q4b – Performance analysis"

MA – Nov 2016 – L2 – Q3c – Budgetary control, Performance analysis

Explain the controllability principle and budgetary slack in the context of responsibility accounting.

Explain the following concepts and describe their application in responsibility accounting:

i) The controllability principle (2.5 marks)

ii) Budgetary slacks (2.5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Nov 2016 – L2 – Q3c – Budgetary control, Performance analysis"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan