(a) Interest risk management
i) Advantages of hedging interest rate risk with interest rate swap:

• Leveraging on relative borrowing advantage: Swaps allow companies to mutually benefit from their relative borrowing advantage by borrowing in markets where they get the best deal and then swapping for the loan type they actually prefer.
• Flexibility and convenience: Swaps are more flexible than other derivatives like futures and options. They can be arranged in any size and reversed if necessary.

Disadvantages of hedging interest rate risk with interest rate swap:

• Counterparty risk: One party may default on the swap, leaving the other party to bear its obligations. This problem can be mitigated with an intermediary, but that increases transaction costs.
• Lack of liquidity: Swaps are not traded in open secondary markets, making it difficult to liquidate a swap contract if needed.

ii) Recommended interest rate risk hedging strategy
The recommended hedging strategy is the one that presents the lowest net
borrowing cost.
Restructure the existing loan
Under this option, the existing fixed rate dollar loan is structured into a floating rate
dollar loan at LIBOR + 200 basis point

Borrowing cost = LIBOR + 2%

Hedging alternative 1: Engage in interest rate swap with a swap bank
Under this arrangement, JB will get the opportunity to pay floating rate (what it
prefers) at LIBOR + 100 basis points to UT bank (the swap bank) in exchange for
a fixed rate payment (what it does not prefer) at the bid fixed rate, 3-year TN rate
+ 35 basis points. The fixed rate payments from the swap bank will be at the bid
rate as in this case the swap bank will be buying a fixed rate from JB.
JB will still honour its fixed rate obligations to the loan syndicate. With the fixed
rate payments received from the swap bank however, much of this fixed rate
obligation is effectively shifted to the swap bank

Note: Though the diagram above aids analysis of interest payments amongst
the parties involved, it is not a requirement to answering the question. Full
credit should be given to a narrative that explains interest flows even without
a diagram.
Net borrowing cost:

That is if JB hedges the interest rate risk with an interest rate swap with UT bank,
its net borrowing cost would be LIBOR + 125 basis points.

Hedging alternative 2: Engage in interest rate swap with another company
Under this arrangement, the entities will swap currency coupons for the type they
prefer. That is, JB would pay to McEwen the floating rate coupons it prefers and
then receive fixed rate coupons from McEwen. Thus, either entity ends up paying
the interest rate type they prefer.

Comment on swap arrangement:

JB would maintain its fixed rate debt, which is at 6.5%; and McEwen keeps its floating rate
debt, which is at LIBOR + 1.5%. And under the swap arrangement, JB pays floating rate
(LIBOR + 1.5%) to McEwen in exchange for a fixed rate (7%). JB then pays 6.5% out of
the fixed interest payment from McEwen to its creditors, and saves 0.5% on the fixed rate
side. On the floating rate side, JB pays LIBOR + 1.5% to McEwen instead of LIBOR + 2%
to creditors if the loan is restructured, and thus saves another 0.5%.
JB effectively ends up paying a floating rate; gains 1%, which reduces its borrowing cost
to LIBOR + 1%
Working:
Take the floating rate that is swapped to be what McEwen could pay under swap (i.e.
LIBOR + 1.5%).
Given that the swap gains are shared equally, the fixed rate that would be swapped is
calculated as under:

Summary:

Recommended hedging strategy
Hedging with interest rate swap with McEwen Ltd is recommended as it present the lowest
net borrowing cost.
JB maintains its fixed rate debt contract with loan syndicate, and engages in a fixed-forfloating interest rate swap with McEwen. Under the swap arrangement, JB pays floating
rate coupons at LIBOR + 1.5% to McEwen in exchange for fixed rate coupons at 7%.
JB then pays 6.5% out of the fixed rate coupons it receives from McEwen to the loan
syndicate. Thus, JB effectively shifts the risk associated with the fixed interest rate
obligation to the counterparty, McEwen.

(b) Internal motivations for transfer pricing

• Performance Evaluation:
  Transfer pricing can be used to evaluate the performance of different divisions or subsidiaries. By treating them as profit centers, the prices set for inter-company transactions allow management to assess the profitability of each unit and hold them accountable for their financial results.
• Management Incentives:
  A well-designed transfer pricing system can serve as a motivation for managers by linking their compensation to the financial performance of their divisions. This encourages efficient management and decision-making aligned with the overall goals of the company.
• Tax and Financing Considerations:
  Transfer pricing allows a company to strategically allocate profits to subsidiaries in jurisdictions with lower tax rates or favorable financial environments, minimizing the overall tax burden and optimizing the company’s cash flow and financing.