- 1 Marks
Question
Yakubu Chukwu & Co was sued by one of its clients who alleged that the firm failed to satisfy the auditing standards in identifying substandard and obsolete inventory while attending end-of-year stock take. Which of the following is the firm’s best defence?
A. It is quite impossible to expect the firm to identify substandard and obsolete inventory due to the special nature of the inventory
B. Yakubu Chukwu & Co has to prove that its audit has been carried out with reasonable skill, care, and diligence
C. Auditing standards are not legislated, therefore, the client has no right to sue the firm
D. The contributory negligence of the client
E. Identification of substandard and obsolete stock requires an expert opinion
Answer
B. Yakubu Chukwu & Co has to prove that its audit has been carried out with reasonable skill, care, and diligence
Explanation:
The best defence for Yakubu Chukwu & Co is to demonstrate that the audit was conducted with reasonable skill, care, and diligence. This standard of professional care is fundamental in audit work, and proving adherence to it would help defend against claims of negligence. Other options, such as arguing the nature of inventory or contributory negligence, do not address the core responsibility of the auditor to exercise due care and skill in their work.
- Tags: Audit Standards, Auditor Liability, Defence, Obsolete Inventory
- Level: Level 3
- Topic: Auditor’s Legal Liability
- Series: NOV 2012
- Uploader: Dotse