Question Tag: Transfer Pricing

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q4b – International Tax Considerations

Key tax issues for BOGML’s planned international expansion to minimize total group tax payable.

The company is planning to expand its operations to Tanzania and South Africa in 2026. As a result, transactions between the head office in Ghana and the prospective foreign subsidiaries will likely take place, leading to potential international tax implications.

Required:

Briefly identify and explain TWO key issues to consider for the company to minimise total tax payable on the group profits.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

AT – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q5a – Transfer Pricing Documentation and Compliance

Explain the required transfer pricing documentation and exemptions under Ghana’s Transfer Pricing Regulations, 2020 (L.I. 2412).

You are a Senior Transfer Pricing Associate of Fameye and Associates. You have received the following email from a former client, Asew LTD, who has received a Transfer Pricing audit assessment from the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) for the 2021, 2022, and 2023 years of assessment.

Subject: Transfer Pricing Compliance Assistance

Hello Team,

I came to the office today and received a letter from the GRA regarding a tax assessment on transfer pricing issues. According to the letter, our company owes the GRA some penalties for non-compliance with the transfer pricing regulations. I am confused as to what our compliance obligations are. I would need your assistance on how we can comply with the transfer pricing laws of Ghana.

I hope to hear from you soon.

Kind regards,

Nii Armaah
Managing Director, Asew LTD

Required:

In line with the provisions of the Transfer Pricing Regulations, 2020 (L.I. 2412), draft a response for the review of your Tax Partner, covering the following:

(i) The required transfer pricing documentation that must be maintained by companies in Ghana under the three-tier transfer pricing documentation requirements, including the time by which these must be filed with the GRA, where applicable.                      (ii) TWO conditions or circumstances under which a company may be exempted from compliance with any of the above documentation requirements.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

MA – Nov 2024 – L2 – Q1a – Transfer Pricing

Explanation of three reasons why Kako PLC determines transfer pricing centrally.

Kako PLC is a multinational company with production divisions trading in many countries across the globe. Trade takes place between a number of the divisions in different countries, with intermediate products being transferred between them. Where a transfer takes place between divisions trading in different countries, it is the policy of the board of the company to determine centrally the right transfer price without reference to the managers in the division.

Required:

i) Explain THREE possible reasons for Kako PLC to determine transfer prices of goods from the head office.

ii) Explain TWO criticisms of the central determination of transfer pricing.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

ATAX – May 2017 – L3 – Q5 – Transfer Pricing

Explain the significance of transfer pricing, its regulation, and methods.

The dwindling oil revenue in recent times has constrained the earning capacity of the Nigerian government. This situation accelerated the slide in the nation’s economy into recession in 2016. There has been a lot of arguments as to which regime’s actions or inactions brought about this economic malaise. Some experts argue that Nigeria has good tax laws, but successive governments displayed a lack of political will to implement them. They posit that the lack of implementation has caused the nation’s Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) to nosedive.

As part of various recommendations by these experts, coupled with the compelling need to shore up the Internally Generated Revenue, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has created the Transfer Pricing Division located in the FIRS Building at Ikoyi, Lagos. To give teeth to its mandate, the Division has been writing multinationals and groups of companies to file returns with it, in respect of their transfer pricing activities.

MGBORIE GROUP LIMITED recently received one of such letters from the FIRS, which startled the Chairman/Chief Executive who is already sensing rough times with the FIRS.

As the company’s tax consultant, the letter was forwarded to you for further explanations.

You are required to state:
a. The significance of Transfer Pricing. (2 Marks)
b. TWO objectives of the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulation Act of 2012. (2 Marks)
c. Contents of the Transfer Pricing Disclosure and Submission Forms to the FIRS. (5 Marks)
d. THREE Transfer Pricing Methods. (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

ATAX – May 2019 – L3 – Q6 – Transfer Pricing

Outline key aspects of transfer pricing regulations in Nigeria, including objectives, key concepts, and methods.

The need for monitoring and controlling the operations of multi-national enterprises (MNEs) and their local subsidiaries or associate companies around the world has necessitated special interest in various governments putting in place mechanisms for the treatment of transfer pricing. Although transfer pricing is not new in Nigeria, the law regulating it, the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulation Act, was enacted in August 2012. It specifies that “every taxpayer” is expected to develop a transfer pricing policy in regard to transfer pricing and control transactions, as well as treatment of transactions of permanent establishments (PE) and dispute resolutions.

You have been invited by the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA) to present a paper at a workshop on transfer pricing regulations in Nigeria. The primary objective of the workshop is to provide the participants, both local and foreign stakeholders in the Nigerian business environment, necessary information on transfer pricing issues in Nigeria.

You are required to outline relevant points to address the following issues:

a. Objectives of application of transfer pricing regulation in Nigeria (3 Marks)
b. The concepts of:
i. Connected taxable persons (3 Marks)
ii. Arm’s length principle (3 Marks)
c. Description of three transfer pricing methods (6 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

FM – Nov 2014 – L3 – SC – Q6a – Treasury Management

Discuss transfer pricing and its implications for multinational companies with subsidiaries in foreign countries.

Nimega Plc is a Nigeria-based multinational company that has subsidiaries in two foreign countries. Both subsidiaries trade with other group members and with four third-party companies.

You are required to present SIX arguments for and FOUR arguments against centralized treasury management in a multinational organization.

(10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

AT – Nov 2014 – L3 – SC – Q5 – Transfer Pricing

Explain transfer pricing objectives, treatment of permanent establishments, and disclosure requirements under FIRS.

You are the Tax Manager of Forum Tax Associates and recently represented your firm at a Workshop organised by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Western Zone, on Transfer Pricing Regulations in Nigeria.

The Workshop was to create awareness on the filing requirements and compliance with the provisions of “The Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2012.”

The Workshop, which was held on the 20th Floor of the Nigeria Stock Exchange building, was fully attended by Company Auditors, Tax Practitioners, Stock Brokers, Bankers, and other Stakeholders.

From the notes you took at the Workshop, you presented a report to the Managing Partner, Forum Tax Associates, on Wednesday, 3 September 2014. The Managing Partner thanked you for a good job and highlighted some key areas of the regulations that will serve as a guide to the staff of the firm.

Required:
Prepare a technical briefing for the staff explaining the following key areas noted by the Managing Partner:
a) Objectives of the application of Transfer Pricing Regulations. (6 Marks)
b) Treatment of Permanent Establishment. (2 Marks)
c) Contents of a Transfer Pricing Disclosure to be submitted by Companies to the FIRS. (7 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

AAA – May 2022 – L3 – Q7 – Risk Management in Audits

Evaluate key risk areas for auditors in consolidating Nigerian and UK company accounts, considering transfer pricing and related party transactions.

BARCHI International Limited is a company with corporate registrations in both the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Nigeria. The Chairman of the company is based in Nigeria and from time to time travels to the U.K. to oversee the office there and order for the purchase of some of the articles for sale. To ensure steady supply of the products, some of the products are also ordered from China. The purchases from the U.K. are charged to the Nigerian entity in pound sterling, while the purchases from China are charged to the Nigerian company in American dollars.

In September 2020, the Chairman embarked on a trip to Dubai for two weeks where he spent part of his annual holiday. During this period, he hosted a couple of friends with the costs that were paid for by the company as the costs were above his approved annual holiday expenses. He subsequently traveled to the U.K. and was quarantined for two weeks due to COVID-19 before moving to the usual business lodge that he uses. Despite using that period to oversee the U.K. company, all the costs incurred were borne by the Nigerian company.

The products bought in the U.K. and sent to Nigeria were charged at cost plus 25%, while the Nigerian company was responsible for insurance and freight. The goods purchased from China were forwarded to Nigeria at the cost of landing in Nigeria plus 30%. The China-made products are less expensive and therefore give better profits despite the cost of the long-distance freight.

Money was transferred to the Chairman’s account for the company’s purchases in the U.K., the purchases made in China, and the Chairman’s personal expenses. An agent in China bought the goods which were paid for by the Chairman.

The U.K. company staff handled the documentation of all the transactions of the Chairman while there and transferred them to Nigeria subject to the approval of the Chairman.

Separate records were not maintained for the Chairman’s expenses in the U.K. However, his comparison of the results of the two units showed that for the immediate past financial year, the Nigerian company had performed sub-optimally and way below the targeted profit in relation to the U.K. company. The Chairman is very unhappy about this as he expects that his personal visit to the U.K. would reduce the purchasing and associated costs.

It is usual for the Chairman to account for the cost of purchases based on his personal expenses attributable to each purchase together with the actual cost of purchases. The U.K. component is elated about this costing method which favors it and would wish that this arrangement continues.

The two units prepare separate financial statements which are audited by separate accounting firms before the two financial statements are consolidated in Nigeria for the Chairman’s evaluation.

Required:

Evaluate, with appropriate justifications, from the scenario above, the areas of risk which the auditor needs to consider. (15 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

ATAX – May 2023 – L3 – Q3 – Transfer Pricing

Explain transfer pricing compliance, declaration, and disclosure requirements along with arm's length comparability factors.

Transfer pricing has become a topical fiscal policy issue globally due to the need for governments to prevent tax evasion and economic double taxation. Developing countries are encouraged to establish regulations to protect their tax bases while maintaining investor confidence.

NADA Incorporated, a multinational company headquartered in Quebec, Canada, plans to establish a textile company in northern Nigeria. While reviewing the Nigerian Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2018, the board of directors identified uncertainties around transfer pricing documentation and arm’s length comparability factors.

You are engaged as the company’s Tax Consultant to clarify these issues.

Required:

Send a report to the Managing Director of PROMOT Link, explaining:

(a) Transfer pricing compliance report (3 Marks)
(b) Transfer pricing declaration form to be submitted to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) (6 Marks)
(c) Transfer pricing disclosure form to be submitted to the FIRS (6 Marks)
(d) Arm’s length comparability factors in transfer pricing (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

ATAX – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q4c – Transfer Pricing

Advisory on maintaining the arm's length principle in inter-company transactions for Abbey Limited.

(c) You are the tax controller of Abbey Limited, the holding company of a group of companies involved in various businesses including: trading, manufacturing, distribution, and packaging. The companies from time to time supply goods and services to each other at pre-determined prices.

You are required to:
Advise the board of Abbey Limited on the factors to be considered when the entities transact business amongst themselves to ensure that the arm’s length principle is upheld.
(8 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

AT- Nov 2022 – L3 – Q4 – Regulatory Environment for Corporate Reporting

Discuss the significance, guiding actions, inconsistencies, compliance areas, and dispute resolution in transfer pricing under Nigeria’s 2018 regulations.

Transfer pricing has become a topical issue in the world of taxation in recent years. This trend is partly driven by the need to prevent fiscal evasion and avoid economic double taxation. Various governments, both in developed and emerging countries, have continued to issue regulations to guide the operations of transfer pricing systems within their jurisdictions.

In Nigeria, the first step toward establishing a legal framework for regulating transfer pricing took place in August 2012, with the enactment of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations Number 1, 2012. Due to shortcomings in the implementation of this regulation, it was revoked, and the Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2018 was subsequently enacted.

One critical principle, enshrined in various transfer pricing regulations, that every taxpayer must comply with when dealing with transactions between related entities is the arm’s length principle. This principle has gained significant attention among academics, regulatory institutions, and professionals, with ongoing debate surrounding its application.

Required:

a. Explain the significance of transfer pricing to both the taxpayers and tax authorities. (2 Marks)

b. In complying with the arm’s length principle, discuss two guiding actions which enterprises and multinationals must follow in their intercompany dealings. (3 Marks)

c. Identify and explain four methods multinational companies might use in financial dealings with associated or subsidiary entities that deviate from the arm’s length principle. (6 Marks)

d. In the administration of the Transfer Pricing Regulations 2018, highlight and discuss three fundamental compliance areas for taxpayers and tax practitioners. (6 Marks)

e. Explain the resolution process for disputes that arise between a taxpayer and tax authorities under the Transfer Pricing Regulations 2018. (3 Marks)

(Total: 20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Divisional Performance Measurement

Analyze transfer pricing impact on divisional performance and group profitability with tax implications for cross-border divisions.

Naijax Group Limited has been in operation since 1980, playing a leading role in the automobile industry.

Division “X,” which is part of the group, manufactures only “265 by 16’’ Rim tyre, which it sells to external customers and also to Division “Y,” another member of the group. Naijax Group’s policy is that:

  • Divisions have the freedom to set transfer prices and choose their suppliers.
  • It uses Residual Income (RI) for performance appraisals.
  • The group’s cost of capital is 12% per annum.

The two divisions’ operating data are as follows:


Division X
Budgeted information for the coming year:
Maximum capacity 150,000 tyres
External sales 110,000 tyres
External selling price N35,000 per tyre
Variable cost N22,000 per tyre
Fixed costs N1,080,000,000
Capital employed N3,200,000,000
Target residual income N180,000,000

Division Y has found two other companies willing to supply tyres:

  • Adex Limited could supply at N28,000 per tyre, but only for annual orders in excess of 50,000 tyres.
  • Banaxa Limited could supply at N33,000 per tyre for any quantity ordered.

Required:

(a) If Division Y provisionally requests a quotation for 60,000 tyres from Division X for the coming year:

i. Determine the transfer price per tyre that Division X should quote in order to meet its residual income target. (9 Marks)

ii. Calculate the TWO prices that Division X would have to quote to Division Y if it becomes the group’s policy to quote transfer prices based on opportunity costs. (2 Marks)

(b) Evaluate the impact of the group’s current and proposed policies on the profits of Divisions X and Y and on group profit. (4 Marks)

c. Assume that Divisions X and Y are based in different countries and consequently pay taxes at different rates: Division X at 55% and Division Y at 25%. If Division X has now quoted a transfer price of N30,000 per tyre for 60,000 tyres, you are required to determine whether it is better for the group if Division Y purchases
60,000 tyres from Division X or from Adex Limited. (15 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – May 2017 – L2 – SA – Q7 – Transfer Pricing

Discuss transfer pricing and recommend pricing structure for internal divisions of Adebel Nigeria Limited.

  1. Adebel Nigeria Limited manufactures motorcycles, operating through two divisions: the assembling division (Division A) and the engine division (Division E). Division E supplies engines to both Division A and external customers. The company’s policy requires that Division E prioritize internal sales to Division A over external sales, while Division A is mandated to purchase exclusively from Division E. However, this policy, along with the transfer price set by Division E, is under review.

    Division Details:

    • Division A anticipates a need for 45,000 engines in the coming year, with an external supplier price of N80,000 per engine.
    • Division E can produce up to 70,000 engines per year, with the following budgeted details:
      • Budgeted sales volume: 70,000 units
      • External selling price: N85,000 per engine
      • Variable cost per unit for external sales: N77,000
      • Variable cost per unit for internal sales to Division A: N3,000 less due to distribution and packaging savings.
      • Maximum external demand: 35,000 units per year.

Requirements:

a. Recommend the transfer price(s) for internal sales, considering the conditions. (5 marks)

b. Using calculations, advise the number of engines Division E should supply to Division A to maximize group profits, assuming a flexible policy. (5 marks)

c. Discuss two performance measures suitable for evaluating divisional performance of autonomous divisions operating as investment centers. (5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – May 2024 – L2 – SC – Q5 – Divisional Performance Measurement

Calculation of transfer prices and performance appraisal in a holding company.

Zona Tango (ZT) plc is a holding company with four divisions, including Alba and Beta Divisions. Alba Division produces a component that it sells externally, and can also transfer to other divisions within the group.

Beta Division uses the components from Alba Division as a raw material for its final product. The division can also obtain the components from external suppliers. The components, when obtained from Alba Division, undergo further processing at a cost of ₦4.50 per unit before they are sold to the external market.

The Board of Directors, in order to implement a new Appraisal Review, has set up a performance scheme for the divisional managers. A performance target for the next financial year has been set, and the following budgeted information relating to the two divisions has been prepared:

Beta Division has asked Alba Division to quote a transfer price for units of the components.

Required:
a. Calculate the transfer price per unit which Alba Division should quote to Beta Division in order that its budgeted residual income target will be achieved. (3 Marks)
b. Calculate the selling price per unit which Beta Division should quote to the external market in order that its budgeted residual income target will be achieved, based on the transfer price quotation. State clearly your assumptions. (3 Marks)
c. Explain why the transfer price calculated in (a) may lead to sub-optimal decision-making from the point of view of ZT plc, taken as a whole. (5 Marks)
d. In what circumstances will a negotiated transfer price be used instead of a market-based price? (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – Nov 2019 – L2 – Q5 – Pricing Decisions

Evaluate profitability and ROI under different transfer pricing schemes between Division A and B of Ezeabunafo Nigeria Ltd.

Ezeabunafo Nigeria Limited, an aluminium company, has two divisions, A and B.
Division A manufactures a single uniform product, which is partly sold in the
external market and partly transferred to division B where it forms the major sub –
assembly for that division‟s product.
The unit cost for each division‟s product is as shown here under:

Past data shows that average of 10,000 units of its products are sold on the
external market each year by Division A at the standard price of N60.
In addition to the external sales, 5,000 units are transferred annually to Division B
at a transfer price of N58 per unit (as above). The transfer price is derived by
deducting variable selling and packaging expenses from the external price since
these expenses are not incurred for internal transfers.
Division B‟s manager disagrees with the basis used to set the transfer price. He
contends that the transfer price should be made at variable cost plus an agreed
(minimal) mark up. It is his view that under the present set-up, his division is
taking output that Division A would be unable to sell at the price of N60.
A study commissioned by the Marketing Director consequent on this disagreement
shows the following:

Division B‟s manager maintains that the study has buttressed his case and calls for
a transfer price of N24 which he points out, would give Division B a reasonable
contribution to its fixed overheads as well as enable B to earn a reasonable profit
which also leads to an enhanced company-wide output and profit performance.

Required:
a. Calculate the contribution at alternative selling prices shown in the study for Division A and identify the price that maximizes Division A’s profit. (6 Marks)
b. Calculate the contribution at alternative prices for Division B and determine if the current selling price of N180 maximizes the firm’s overall profit. (5 Marks)
c. Assuming a transfer price equal to Division A’s variable costs, calculate the contribution for Division B at alternative prices. (3 Marks)
d. Calculate the contribution per unit and comment on how the whole firm is affected under this situation. (3 Marks)
e. Evaluate the effect on company profits if Division B’s manager’s suggestion of a N24 transfer price is adopted. (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – Nov 2019 – L2 – Q3 – Pricing Decisions

Evaluate divisional and company profit, ROI, and RI for Rinc Nigeria Ltd.

Rinc Nigeria Limited has two divisions, A and B. Division A specializes in the manufacture of a special part of a product while Division B completes the production and sells the final product. Division A also sells its components to third parties, and Division B can buy parts from external suppliers. Both divisions are profit centers.

The following are for the month of November:

Required:
a. Calculate the profit made by each division and the company as a whole for November. (10 Marks)
b. Calculate the ROI and RI of the divisions and the company. (5 Marks)
c. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of ROI and RI as parameters for appraising divisional performance. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – Nov 2021 – L2 – Q7 – Pricing Decisions

Calculate transfer prices to meet residual income targets and evaluate sub-optimal decisions for Garki plc.

Garki plc is a holding company with four divisions, including Alba and Beta Divisions. Alba Division produces a component that it sells externally and can also transfer to other divisions within the group. Beta Division uses the components from Alba Division as raw material for its final product. The division can also obtain components from external suppliers. The components from Alba Division undergo further processing at a cost of N4.50 per unit before they are sold to the external market.

The Board of Directors has set up a performance scheme for the divisional managers, including setting performance targets for the next financial year. The following budgeted information is available:

Alba Division Beta Division
Maximum Production Capacity 900,000 units
Sales to External Customers 700,000 units
Selling Price (N) N6.80
Variable Unit Cost (N) N4.90
Divisional Fixed Costs N160,000 N140,000
Capital Employed N4 million N3 million
Residual Income N700,000 N500,000
Divisional Cost of Capital 12% 10%

Beta Division has asked Alba Division to quote a transfer price for the components.

Required:
a. Calculate the transfer price per unit which Alba Division should quote to Beta Division in order for its budgeted residual income target to be achieved. (3 Marks)
b. Calculate the selling price per unit which Beta Division should quote to the external market in order for its budgeted residual income target to be achieved, based on the transfer price quotation. (State clearly your assumptions.) (3 Marks)
c. Explain why the transfer price calculated in (a) may lead to sub-optimal decision-making from the point of view of Garki plc as a whole. (5 Marks)
d. In what circumstances would a negotiated transfer price be used instead of a market-based price? (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q5 – Transfer Pricing

Profitability analysis for two divisions, including transfer pricing and external supplier impacts.

TK is a company that produces toy television sets targeting children of the elite. The company has two divisions, Division S and Division B. Division S manufactures components for the televisions and sells components to Division B and to external customers. Division B uses five of the components in each of the toy television sets that it manufactures and sells television sets directly to external customers.

Division S
Budgeted variable manufacturing cost per component (N):

  • Direct material: 140
  • Direct labour: 180
  • Variable overhead: 120

Additional Information:

  • Fixed costs: N5,600,000
  • Production capacity: 175,000 components
  • External demand: 150,000 components
  • Potential demand from Division B: 80,000 components
  • Anticipated external market price for a component: N500

Division B

  • Sales price: N4,500
  • Budgeted variable manufacturing cost per television (N):
    • Direct material: 400
    • Direct labour: 620
    • Variable overhead: 160

Each toy television set produced needs five components. Fixed costs are budgeted to be N14,600,000 for next year. Annual sales of the toy television sets are expected to be 16,000 units.

Transfer Pricing Policy:

  • Transfer prices are set at opportunity cost.
  • Division S must satisfy the demand of Division B before selling components externally.
  • Division B is allowed to purchase components from Division S or from external suppliers.

Required:
a. Assuming that Division B buys all the components it requires from Division S:
Prepare a profit statement for each division detailing sales and costs, showing external sales and internal company transfers separately where appropriate. (6 Marks)

b. A specialist external supplier has approached Division B and offered to supply 80,000 components at a price of N420 each. The components fulfil the same function as those manufactured by Division S. The manager of Division B has accepted the offer and agreed to buy all the components it requires from this supplier:
i. Produce a revised profit statement for each division and for the total TK company.
ii. Division S has just received an enquiry from a new customer for the production of 25,000 components. The manager of Division S requires a total profit for the year for the division of N4,500,000.

  • Calculate the minimum price per component to sell the 25,000 components to the new customer that would enable the manager of Division S to meet the profit target. (4 Marks)

Note: This order will have no effect on the divisional fixed costs and no impact on the 150,000 components Division S sells to its existing external customers at N500 per component. Division B will continue to purchase the 80,000 components it requires from the specialist external supplier.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – May 2018 – L2 – Q1 – Divisional Performance Measurement and Transfer Pricing

Differentiate responsibility centres, explain divisional structure, recommend transfer prices, and consider qualitative factors.

DASET DRINKS NIGERIA PLC.
(30 MARKS)
Daset Drinks Nigeria Plc. has been operating in the Nigerian food and beverages
industry as an entity with three distinct factories across the country. One of the
factories bottles soft drink while the other two produce bottles and crown corks for
the soft drink factory.
The company has recently been experiencing problems with its performance
evaluation system across the three factories. Each factory manager is of the
opinion that his factory is the one contributing the most to the overall performance
of the company.
In a recent management retreat, the guest speaker, a performance management
expert, emphasised the need to develop Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for each
of the factories and departments in the company. According to him, this will
enhance performance evaluation of all the managers in the company and will also
make performance management easier. He suggested that the company should
adopt a divisional structure whereby each of the factories will become an
autonomous division with responsibilities for investment, revenues, profits and
costs.
At the last Executive Management meeting, after the retreat, the company‟s top
management decided to adopt the recommendations of the guest speaker. The top
management agreed transfer prices acceptable to each of the divisional managers
and also the needs to decide whether the two factories manufacturing bottles and
corks cocks could sell to external markets.
The top management has mandated you, as the company‟s management
accountant, to supply necessary data that will assist them in taking appropriate
decisions.

Financial data collected about the company‟s operations are as follows:
The costs and selling prices of the divisions are:

This includes costs of bottle and crown cork. To produce one bottle of soft drink
requires one bottle and one crown cork.
The bottling division has the choice to buy its bottle and crown cork requirements
from the external market.
The variable costs of production for external sales and internal transfers are the
same and bottles and crown corks are being transferred to the bottling division at
these costs.
For brand protection, the soft drink factory is not willing to buy bottles and crown
corks from any external supplier.
Required:
a. Differentiate among an investment centre, a profit centre, a revenue centre
and a cost centre, in a divisional organisation giving one example of each.
(8 Marks)

b. Explain a divisional structure, stating the problems associated with this type
of structure in an organisation. (8 Marks)

c. Advise the top management on the transfer prices that will maximise the
company‟s profit and be acceptable to the factory managers.
(10 Marks)
d. Discuss TWO qualitative factors that the top management needs to consider
in taking these decisions. (4 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

PM – May 2019 – L2 – Q3 – Divisional Performance Measurement

Calculate and analyze ROCE for Peterpan's subsidiaries and discuss performance excluding intra-group transactions.

Peterpan Nigeria Limited is a holding company with two subsidiaries manufacturing similar products in different regions of the country. These are Peterpan (Eastern) Nigeria Limited and Peterpan (Western) Nigeria Limited. Return on capital employed (ROCE) is used as the group’s performance measure and is also used to determine divisional managers’ bonuses. The results of the two companies and of the holding company for the year ended 31 December, 2018, and the statement of financial position as at that date are as follows:

Item Western (₦000) Eastern (₦000) Peterpan (₦000)
Revenue 400,000 440,000 792,941
Cost of sales (340,000) (330,000) (630,000)
Gross profit 60,000 110,000 162,941
Administrative costs (20,000) (60,000) (80,000)
Interest payable (20,000) (20,000)
Pre-tax profit 20,000 60,000 62,941

Non-current assets:

Item
Original cost 2,000,000 300,000 3,000,000
Accumulated depreciation (1,180,800) (320,000) (2,213,568)
Net book value 819,200 120,000 786,432
Net current assets 100,000 120,000 906,432
Total assets 919,200 906,432 1,825,632
Non-current borrowings 300,000 300,000
Shareholders’ fund 619,200 786,432 1,525,632
Capital employed 919,200 906,432 1,825,632

Additional Information:

  1. During the year, Eastern Limited sold goods to Western Limited that had cost Eastern Limited ₦20,000,000. The transactions relating to this sale have been eliminated from the holding company’s results stated above.
  2. Both companies use the same depreciation policy of 20% per annum on a reducing balance basis for their non-current assets. Neither company made any additions or disposals of non-current assets during the year.
  3. During the last board meeting of the holding company, it was decided that the holding company should impose a transfer pricing policy for transfers between the two subsidiaries.

Required:

a. Calculate the return on capital employed (ROCE) ratios for each of the two subsidiaries for the year and analyze these into their secondary ratio components of: i. Pre-Tax Profit % ii. Asset Turnover (3 Marks)

b. i. Calculate Eastern Limited’s gross profit margin on its internal sales and compare this to the gross profit margin on its external sales. (2 Marks)
ii. Discuss the performance of the two subsidiaries excluding the effects of the intra-group transactions. (9 Marks)

c. Explain THREE factors that management should consider when setting the transfer pricing policy. (6 Marks)
(Total 20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.