Question Tag: Economic Value Added

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q3 – Strategic Performance Measurement

Calculation of EVA for Jack Limited using adjusted financial data and WACC to assess value creation.

Jack Limited is a family-owned business which has grown strongly in the last 50 years. The key objective of the company is to maximize the family’s wealth through their shareholdings. Recently, the directors introduced value-based management, using Economic Value Added (EVA) as the index for measuring performance.

You are provided with the following financial information:

Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2015

Item Amount (₦’million)
Operating profit 340.0
Finance charges (115.0)
Profit before tax 225.0
Tax at 25% (56.3)
Profit after tax 168.7

Notes

Description 2015 (₦’m) 2014 (₦’m)
(i) Capital employed – from the Statement of Financial Position 6,285 6,185
(ii) Operating costs: Depreciation 295 285
Provision for doubtful debts 10 2.5
Research and development 60
Other non-cash expenses 35 30
Marketing expenses 50 45
  1. Economic depreciation is assessed to be ₦415 in 2015. Economic depreciation includes any appropriate amortization adjustments. In previous years, it can be assumed that economic and accounting depreciation were the same.
  2. Tax: The cash paid in the current year is ₦45 million, with an adjustment of ₦2.5 million for deferred tax provisions. There was no deferred tax balance prior to 2015.
  3. The provision for doubtful debts was ₦22.5 million on the 2015 Statement of Financial Position.
  4. Research and development cost is not capitalized in the accounts. It relates to a new project that will be developed over five years and is expected to be of long-term benefit to the company. The first year of this project is 2015.
  5. The company has been spending heavily on marketing each year to build its brand long-term.
  6. Estimated cost of capital for the company:
    • Equity: 16%
    • Debt (pre-tax): 5%
  7. Gearing (Debt/Equity) Ratio: 1.5:1

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q3 – Strategic Performance Measurement"

PM – May 2022 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Performance Evaluation

Evaluate Uzochuks' financial performance using ARR and EVA, and assess the NPV of a solar project.

Uzochuks Nigeria Limited is a company established four years ago to produce medical equipment. The income statement and statement of financial position for 2019 and 2020 are as follows:

(ii) Economic depreciation is assessed to be N50.5million in 2020. Economic depreciation includes any appropriate amortisation adjustments. In previous years, it can be assumed that economic and accounting depreciation were the same.
(iii) Tax is the cash paid in the current year (N16 million) and an adjustment of N2 million for deferred tax provisions. There was no deferred tax balance prior to 2020.
(iv) The provision for doubtful debts was N2.5million on the 2020 statement of financial position.
(v) Research and development is not capitalised in the accounts. It relates to a new project that will be developed over five years and is expected to be of long-term benefit to the company. 2020 is the first year of this project.
(vi) The company had a non-capitalised leased assets of N18million in January 2020. These assets are not subjected to depreciation.
(vii) Cost of capital of Uzochuks:
Equity 18%
Debt (pre-tax) 6%
(viii) Capital structure of Uzochuks:
Equity 60%
Debt 40%
(ix) The company had the opportunity to invest in a solar project that will require the procurement of an equipment worth N3million in January 2020 and run for a period of 5 years with a salvage value of N0.50million, generating a stable net cash flow of N0.85 million. The applicable cost of capital is the associated weighted average cost of capital of the company.

Required:
a. i. Compute and evaluate the company’s performance using the average rate of return (ARR). (4 Marks)
ii. Compute and evaluate the company’s performance using the economic value added (EVA) parameter. (9 Marks)
b. Calculate the net present value (NPV) of a solar project that will require the procurement of equipment worth N3 million in January 2020, generating a stable net cash flow of N0.85 million annually for five years with a salvage value of N0.50 million. The applicable cost of capital is the associated weighted average cost of capital of the company. (7 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – May 2022 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Performance Evaluation"

PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – Economic Value Added (EVA) and Regulatory ROCE for Ibok Power Nigeria Limited

Evaluate the performance of Ibok Power Nigeria Limited using EVA and regulatory ROCE, discussing impacts on performance management.

Ibok Power Nigeria Limited (IPN) is a power utility company providing power distribution services to the public and businesses of Southern Nigeria. The company was formed when the government-owned Power Holding Company of Nigeria was broken up into regional utility companies (one of which was IPN) and sold into private ownership over four years ago.

As a vital utility for the economy of Nigeria, power services are a government-regulated industry. The regulator is principally concerned that IPN does not abuse its monopoly position in the regional market to unjustifiably increase prices. The majority of services (80%) are controlled by the regulator, who sets an acceptable return on capital employed (ROCE) level and ensures that the pricing of IPN within these areas does not breach this level. The remaining services, such as the provision of meters and contract repair services, are unregulated, and IPN can charge a market rate for these. The regulator calculates its ROCE figure based on its own valuation of the capital assets being used in regulated services and the operating profit from those regulated services.

The target pre-tax ROCE set by the regulator is 6%. If IPN were to breach this figure, then the regulator could fine the company. In the past, other such companies have paid fines amounting to millions of naira.

The board of IPN is trying to drive the performance for the benefit of shareholders. This is a new experience for many at IPN, who left the public sector four years ago. In order to better communicate the objective of maximising shareholders’ wealth, the board has decided to introduce economic value added (EVA) as the key performance indicator.

The finance director has provided the following financial information for the year ending September 30, 2018:
Ibok Power Services

Notes:
(i)
(ii) Economic depreciation is assessed to be N41.5bn in 2018. In previous years, economic and accounting depreciation were assumed to be the same.
(iii) Tax is the cash paid in the current year (N4.5bn) and includes an adjustment of N0.25bn for deferred tax provisions. No deferred tax balance existed before 2018.
(iv) The provision for doubtful debts was N2.25bn in 2018.
(v) The research and development project is not capitalised and is expected to benefit the company in the long-term. 2018 is the first year of this project.
(vi) IPN’s cost of capital is as follows:
Equity: 16%
Debt (pre-tax): 5%
(vii) Capital structure: 40% equity, 60% debt.

Required:
(a) Evaluate the performance of IPN using EVA. (13 Marks)
(b) Assess whether IPN meets its regulatory ROCE target and comment on the impact of such a constraint on performance management at IPN. (7 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – Economic Value Added (EVA) and Regulatory ROCE for Ibok Power Nigeria Limited"

MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement

Calculate EVA for Vilagio Engineering for 2021 and 2022 and comment on its performance.

Vilagio Engineering (VE) is a listed company manufacturing pumps and valves for use in the irrigation sector. The CEO has tasked you to assess Vilagio’s performance using Economic Value Added. Below is an extract of their financial statements.

Income Statement extract for the year:

Additional information:
i) Capital employed at the end of 2020 amounted to GH¢350 million.
ii) VE had non-capitalised leases valued at GH¢16 million in each of the years 2020 to 2022. Ignore amortisation calculations.
iii) VE’s pre-tax cost of debt was estimated to be 9% in 2021 and 10% in 2022.
iv) VE’s cost of equity was estimated to be 15% in 2021 and 17% in 2022.
v) The target capital structure is 70% equity, 30% debt.
vi) The rate of taxation is 30% in both 2021 and 2022.
vii) Economic depreciation amounted to GH¢64 million in 2021 and GH¢72 million in 2022. These amounts were equal to the depreciation used for tax purposes and depreciation charged in the income statements.
viii) Interest payable amounted to GH¢6 million in 2021 and GH¢8 million in 2022.
ix) Other non-cash expenses amounted to GH¢20 million per year in both 2021 and 2022.

Required:
a) Estimate the Economic Value Added (EVA) for Vilagio Engineering for both 2021 and 2022, and comment on the company’s performance.
b) State THREE (3) advantages and TWO (2) disadvantages of EVA.
c) Explain the relationship between EVA and Net Present Value (NPV).

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement"

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q3 – Strategic Performance Measurement

Calculation of EVA for Jack Limited using adjusted financial data and WACC to assess value creation.

Jack Limited is a family-owned business which has grown strongly in the last 50 years. The key objective of the company is to maximize the family’s wealth through their shareholdings. Recently, the directors introduced value-based management, using Economic Value Added (EVA) as the index for measuring performance.

You are provided with the following financial information:

Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2015

Item Amount (₦’million)
Operating profit 340.0
Finance charges (115.0)
Profit before tax 225.0
Tax at 25% (56.3)
Profit after tax 168.7

Notes

Description 2015 (₦’m) 2014 (₦’m)
(i) Capital employed – from the Statement of Financial Position 6,285 6,185
(ii) Operating costs: Depreciation 295 285
Provision for doubtful debts 10 2.5
Research and development 60
Other non-cash expenses 35 30
Marketing expenses 50 45
  1. Economic depreciation is assessed to be ₦415 in 2015. Economic depreciation includes any appropriate amortization adjustments. In previous years, it can be assumed that economic and accounting depreciation were the same.
  2. Tax: The cash paid in the current year is ₦45 million, with an adjustment of ₦2.5 million for deferred tax provisions. There was no deferred tax balance prior to 2015.
  3. The provision for doubtful debts was ₦22.5 million on the 2015 Statement of Financial Position.
  4. Research and development cost is not capitalized in the accounts. It relates to a new project that will be developed over five years and is expected to be of long-term benefit to the company. The first year of this project is 2015.
  5. The company has been spending heavily on marketing each year to build its brand long-term.
  6. Estimated cost of capital for the company:
    • Equity: 16%
    • Debt (pre-tax): 5%
  7. Gearing (Debt/Equity) Ratio: 1.5:1

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q3 – Strategic Performance Measurement"

PM – May 2022 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Performance Evaluation

Evaluate Uzochuks' financial performance using ARR and EVA, and assess the NPV of a solar project.

Uzochuks Nigeria Limited is a company established four years ago to produce medical equipment. The income statement and statement of financial position for 2019 and 2020 are as follows:

(ii) Economic depreciation is assessed to be N50.5million in 2020. Economic depreciation includes any appropriate amortisation adjustments. In previous years, it can be assumed that economic and accounting depreciation were the same.
(iii) Tax is the cash paid in the current year (N16 million) and an adjustment of N2 million for deferred tax provisions. There was no deferred tax balance prior to 2020.
(iv) The provision for doubtful debts was N2.5million on the 2020 statement of financial position.
(v) Research and development is not capitalised in the accounts. It relates to a new project that will be developed over five years and is expected to be of long-term benefit to the company. 2020 is the first year of this project.
(vi) The company had a non-capitalised leased assets of N18million in January 2020. These assets are not subjected to depreciation.
(vii) Cost of capital of Uzochuks:
Equity 18%
Debt (pre-tax) 6%
(viii) Capital structure of Uzochuks:
Equity 60%
Debt 40%
(ix) The company had the opportunity to invest in a solar project that will require the procurement of an equipment worth N3million in January 2020 and run for a period of 5 years with a salvage value of N0.50million, generating a stable net cash flow of N0.85 million. The applicable cost of capital is the associated weighted average cost of capital of the company.

Required:
a. i. Compute and evaluate the company’s performance using the average rate of return (ARR). (4 Marks)
ii. Compute and evaluate the company’s performance using the economic value added (EVA) parameter. (9 Marks)
b. Calculate the net present value (NPV) of a solar project that will require the procurement of equipment worth N3 million in January 2020, generating a stable net cash flow of N0.85 million annually for five years with a salvage value of N0.50 million. The applicable cost of capital is the associated weighted average cost of capital of the company. (7 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – May 2022 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Performance Evaluation"

PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – Economic Value Added (EVA) and Regulatory ROCE for Ibok Power Nigeria Limited

Evaluate the performance of Ibok Power Nigeria Limited using EVA and regulatory ROCE, discussing impacts on performance management.

Ibok Power Nigeria Limited (IPN) is a power utility company providing power distribution services to the public and businesses of Southern Nigeria. The company was formed when the government-owned Power Holding Company of Nigeria was broken up into regional utility companies (one of which was IPN) and sold into private ownership over four years ago.

As a vital utility for the economy of Nigeria, power services are a government-regulated industry. The regulator is principally concerned that IPN does not abuse its monopoly position in the regional market to unjustifiably increase prices. The majority of services (80%) are controlled by the regulator, who sets an acceptable return on capital employed (ROCE) level and ensures that the pricing of IPN within these areas does not breach this level. The remaining services, such as the provision of meters and contract repair services, are unregulated, and IPN can charge a market rate for these. The regulator calculates its ROCE figure based on its own valuation of the capital assets being used in regulated services and the operating profit from those regulated services.

The target pre-tax ROCE set by the regulator is 6%. If IPN were to breach this figure, then the regulator could fine the company. In the past, other such companies have paid fines amounting to millions of naira.

The board of IPN is trying to drive the performance for the benefit of shareholders. This is a new experience for many at IPN, who left the public sector four years ago. In order to better communicate the objective of maximising shareholders’ wealth, the board has decided to introduce economic value added (EVA) as the key performance indicator.

The finance director has provided the following financial information for the year ending September 30, 2018:
Ibok Power Services

Notes:
(i)
(ii) Economic depreciation is assessed to be N41.5bn in 2018. In previous years, economic and accounting depreciation were assumed to be the same.
(iii) Tax is the cash paid in the current year (N4.5bn) and includes an adjustment of N0.25bn for deferred tax provisions. No deferred tax balance existed before 2018.
(iv) The provision for doubtful debts was N2.25bn in 2018.
(v) The research and development project is not capitalised and is expected to benefit the company in the long-term. 2018 is the first year of this project.
(vi) IPN’s cost of capital is as follows:
Equity: 16%
Debt (pre-tax): 5%
(vii) Capital structure: 40% equity, 60% debt.

Required:
(a) Evaluate the performance of IPN using EVA. (13 Marks)
(b) Assess whether IPN meets its regulatory ROCE target and comment on the impact of such a constraint on performance management at IPN. (7 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – PM – Mar/Jul 2020 – L2 – Q4 – Economic Value Added (EVA) and Regulatory ROCE for Ibok Power Nigeria Limited"

MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement

Calculate EVA for Vilagio Engineering for 2021 and 2022 and comment on its performance.

Vilagio Engineering (VE) is a listed company manufacturing pumps and valves for use in the irrigation sector. The CEO has tasked you to assess Vilagio’s performance using Economic Value Added. Below is an extract of their financial statements.

Income Statement extract for the year:

Additional information:
i) Capital employed at the end of 2020 amounted to GH¢350 million.
ii) VE had non-capitalised leases valued at GH¢16 million in each of the years 2020 to 2022. Ignore amortisation calculations.
iii) VE’s pre-tax cost of debt was estimated to be 9% in 2021 and 10% in 2022.
iv) VE’s cost of equity was estimated to be 15% in 2021 and 17% in 2022.
v) The target capital structure is 70% equity, 30% debt.
vi) The rate of taxation is 30% in both 2021 and 2022.
vii) Economic depreciation amounted to GH¢64 million in 2021 and GH¢72 million in 2022. These amounts were equal to the depreciation used for tax purposes and depreciation charged in the income statements.
viii) Interest payable amounted to GH¢6 million in 2021 and GH¢8 million in 2022.
ix) Other non-cash expenses amounted to GH¢20 million per year in both 2021 and 2022.

Required:
a) Estimate the Economic Value Added (EVA) for Vilagio Engineering for both 2021 and 2022, and comment on the company’s performance.
b) State THREE (3) advantages and TWO (2) disadvantages of EVA.
c) Explain the relationship between EVA and Net Present Value (NPV).

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MA – Mar 2023 – L2 – Q1a – Other aspects of performance measurement"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan