Question Tag: Auditor Independence

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

AA – Mar 2025 – L2 – Q1 – Assurance Engagements

Explain five elements of an assurance engagement per IAASB Handbook 2023-2024.

a) IAASB Handbook 2023-2024 edition, includes the definition of assurance engagements and its elements, which is a very useful piece of information for external auditors.

Required:

Explain FIVE elements of assurance engagement as defined in the IAASB Handbook 2023-2024 edition.

b) Section 320 of the IESBA Code of Ethics includes the requirement and procedures that auditors are required to follow before acceptance of new client relationship or changes in an existing engagement.

Required:

State and explain FIVE factors to consider in client engagement acceptance as explained in Section 320 of the IESBA Code of Ethics.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Mar 2025 – L2 – Q1 – Assurance Engagements"

AAA – Mar 2025 – L3 – Q5 – Related Party Transactions

Identify 5 procedures to mitigate risks in related party transactions per 2020 Corporate Governance Code.

(a). According to the corporate governance code for listed companies 2020 SEC/CD/001/10/2020, The Board of Directors shall adopt a related party transactions policy to identify relevant related parties to the company and any transactions with related parties that may take place and which specifies procedures to be adopted that will mitigate the risk that such transactions may be conducted in a way that constitutes a conflict of interest or which is against the interests of shareholders as a whole.

Required:

Identify FIVE procedures to be adopted by a Board that will mitigate the risk that related party transactions conducted are against the interest of shareholders.

(b). The Institute of Chartered Accountants, Ghana Act, 2020 (Act 1058) requires a firm of Chartered Accountants to be registered as a sole proprietorship or partnership but not as a limited liability company.

Required:

Discuss FOUR potential issues with audit firms registering as limited liability companies.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Mar 2025 – L3 – Q5 – Related Party Transactions"

AAA – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q1a – Ethical Issues in Audit Engagements

Ethical issues and professional conduct in an audit engagement involving conflict of interest.

You are the Audit Partner of a mid-sized audit firm, Amoah Sonko and Associates. One of your major clients, Kudi LTD (Kudi), has approached you for a significant audit engagement. Kudi has been experiencing rapid growth and plans to get listed on the Ghana Alternative Market within the next year. During preliminary discussions, the Managing Director of Kudi, a friend, promised you a bonus if the audit report is completed quickly and is favourable, highlighting the company’s strengths.

In the course of the audit of Kudi, you came across a series of unusual financial transactions. These included large intercompany loans with its sister companies, other significant related-party transactions with the directors, and an unusually high volume of sales recorded a few days before the end of the financial year. Upon further investigation, your team found discrepancies in inventory records and evidence of potential non-compliance with revenue recognition standards. The Finance Manager insists these transactions are legitimate and necessary for the company’s rapid growth.

Additionally, you noticed that Kudi was involved in a high-profile legal battle with a major competitor, which was not fully disclosed in the financial statements. The lawyer for Kudi insists that you omit this information from the audit report, arguing it would damage the company’s reputation and its plans to get listed on the Ghana Alternative Market.

Required:
i) Identify TWO potential ethical issues in the scenario and explain the potential impact on your professional conduct.                      ii) Identify the steps you should take to address the conflict of interest presented by the Managing Director’s offer. 
iii) Discuss the potential sanctions for accepting the Managing Director’s offer and providing a favourable audit report without proper verification. 
iv) Evaluate the impact of the undisclosed legal battle on Kudi LTD’s financial statements and the upcoming initial public offer.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q1a – Ethical Issues in Audit Engagements"

AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – AII – Q20 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Define the situation where an auditor's role as a rival to the client impairs objectivity.

A situation which puts the auditor as opponent or rival of the client and which may impair his objectivity is termed…………………….

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – AII – Q20 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Discuss ethical and legal obligations of auditors regarding independence, confidentiality, money laundering, and client competition safeguards.

As an Audit Manager in a big audit firm in Nigeria, you were opportuned to attend a conference on Professional Ethics and Anti-Money Laundering in New York. On your return, one of the audit seniors went through the presentations and asked questions on some of the statements she noted in the presentations.

You are required to explain the following statements to her:

a. A good Auditor is an independent auditor. (5 Marks)
b. The Accountant’s normal professional duty of confidentiality to clients is not an adequate defence where money laundering is involved. (5 Marks)
c. Specific obligations for detecting and reporting suspicions of money laundering are placed on professional firms. (5 Marks)
d. A firm might act for two clients that are in direct competition with each other where there are acceptable safeguards. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Evaluate internal and external business risks and outline pre-engagement activities for Sunsit Manufacturers Ltd.

The auditors of Sunsit Manufacturers Limited had disagreements with the company on various issues. This came to a climax with the withholding of a part of the payment of the last audit fees. The auditors had also been disenchanted with the undue pressures of management and have decided that, as a result of this and the withheld fees, they would disengage from the client.

The company’s chairman, in consideration of past issues, has considered the size of the audit firm as being partly responsible for its inability to manage adequately the pressures from the company’s accounting and management team. He has subsequently approached your firm for a change, and the partners have accepted the engagement despite the predecessor auditor’s declaration of the forfeiture of the firm’s outstanding fees and no further involvement with the client and issues relating to the company.

Required:

a. Following the background to the client and the engagement, evaluate the internal and external business risks that need to be considered with respect to the client. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the pre-engagement activities to be carried on the client. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identifies a service inappropriate for an audit firm to provide due to independence and ethical concerns.

Which ONE of these services may not be appropriate for an audit firm?

  • A. Advising clients on corporate structures, recruitment, and other human capital needs
  • B. Giving necessary legal advice on tax returns including negotiation with the tax authorities
  • C. Acting as a receiver of the company’s operations on behalf of debenture holders and creditors of the company
  • D. Making detailed enquiries and gathering all necessary information to meet the clients’ specific needs
  • E. Advising clients on how best the business can be run and controlled including issues of accountability and management

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Evaluate ethical threats due to auditor relationships and actions, and recommend mitigations for compliance.

The following scenarios may threaten compliance with fundamental principles in auditing:

i. The audit supervisor is married to the daughter of the Managing Director of the client company;

ii. The audit firm’s Senior Partner holds shares in the client company;

iii. The assurance firm also provides valuation services, internal audit services, and taxation services to an assurance client;

iv. The assurance firm earns more than 50% of its annual revenue from one assurance client; and

v. The firm obtained motor vehicle financing from a client bank for its staff.

Required:

a. Explain why compliance with fundamental principles in auditing may be threatened in each of the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

b. Explain FIVE ethical requirements that would reduce or mitigate the threats to compliance with the fundamental principles in the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance

Ethical and governance issues in appointing auditors with familial ties to company management.

ROC Company Plc. manufactures aluminium (stainless) household equipment. Its plant is located by Alobe river, which is the source of water for the community. The company currently has the largest share of the market on the West African Coast and plans to expand its operations to East African and South African markets.

At the 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM), shareholders approved the appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to the company. The Managing Partner of Adeola & Partners, Sir Segun Adeola, is a nephew of the Managing Director of ROC Company Plc. The appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to ROC Company was facilitated by the Managing Director, who did not disclose his relationship with Sir Segun Adeola to the company’s board.

At a recent board meeting, the Managing Director of ROC expressed concern that so much resources were expended towards satisfying the interest of the community at the expense of the company’s shareholders. According to him, shareholders are the primary stakeholders of the company, and their interest should be given the highest priority. He further opined that although other stakeholders are important to the company but only to the extent that ROC needs them. Consequently, the board resolved that henceforth, the company should not spend more than 0.5% of its Profit After Tax (PAT) on other stakeholders.

At the peak of the company’s production cycle, one of its underground waste tanks ruptured, and a large quantity of chemical waste leaked into Alobe river. This led to the destruction of aquatic life and contamination of neighbouring farmlands. This catastrophic event devastated the community as many farmers and fishermen lost their sources of livelihood. The community’s major source of drinking water was also contaminated.

The leadership of Alobe River Community Association approached the management of ROC Company Plc. and requested them to pay huge sums as compensation to the affected people and also to construct ten bore holes for the community. The management, however, informed the community leaders that based on the resolution of their board, expenditure on the issue would be limited to only 0.5% of profit after tax at the end of the year, which was projected to be far less than the amount of compensation demanded by the community. As a result, all discussions with the leadership of the community broke down.

The youths of the community responded with a sit-in protest, leading to a blockade of the company’s gate and disruption of its operations. The board of the company is now seeking immediate and amicable resolution of this problem.

While this was going on, the company suffered a major fire outbreak in its second factory, destroying its main furnace, machines and a large quantity of its finished goods. Some of the workers were severely burnt while attempting to put out the fire at the factory’s major warehouse. This event culminated in production shutdown at the second factory and temporary disengagement of several skilled workers as well as some casual staff. Fortunately, the company is covered by comprehensive fire and workers compensation insurance policies with Nagode Risk and Life Assurance Plc.

Required:
a. As a Strategic Risk Consultant of ROC Company Plc. you are to evaluate the adequacy of the risk management processes, including its information and communication systems. (8 Marks)

b. Evaluate the company’s residual risks in contrast to the management’s risk appetite. (7 Marks)

c. Using the stakeholders theory, evaluate the Managing Director’s position. Are there other stakeholders important to the company? (9 Marks)

d. Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the scenario described above. (6 Marks)


Answer:

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance"

AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors

Explain threats to auditor independence and provide examples of each.

The ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members gives a list of threats to auditors’ independence, which may impair integrity, objectivity, or the good reputation of the profession.

Required:

Explain the following threats and give TWO examples each of circumstances that may lead to the threats:

a. Self-Interest (3 Marks)

b. Self-Review (3 Marks)

c. Advocacy (3 Marks)

d. Familiarity (3 Marks)

e. Intimidation (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors"

AA – Mar 2025 – L2 – Q1 – Assurance Engagements

Explain five elements of an assurance engagement per IAASB Handbook 2023-2024.

a) IAASB Handbook 2023-2024 edition, includes the definition of assurance engagements and its elements, which is a very useful piece of information for external auditors.

Required:

Explain FIVE elements of assurance engagement as defined in the IAASB Handbook 2023-2024 edition.

b) Section 320 of the IESBA Code of Ethics includes the requirement and procedures that auditors are required to follow before acceptance of new client relationship or changes in an existing engagement.

Required:

State and explain FIVE factors to consider in client engagement acceptance as explained in Section 320 of the IESBA Code of Ethics.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Mar 2025 – L2 – Q1 – Assurance Engagements"

AAA – Mar 2025 – L3 – Q5 – Related Party Transactions

Identify 5 procedures to mitigate risks in related party transactions per 2020 Corporate Governance Code.

(a). According to the corporate governance code for listed companies 2020 SEC/CD/001/10/2020, The Board of Directors shall adopt a related party transactions policy to identify relevant related parties to the company and any transactions with related parties that may take place and which specifies procedures to be adopted that will mitigate the risk that such transactions may be conducted in a way that constitutes a conflict of interest or which is against the interests of shareholders as a whole.

Required:

Identify FIVE procedures to be adopted by a Board that will mitigate the risk that related party transactions conducted are against the interest of shareholders.

(b). The Institute of Chartered Accountants, Ghana Act, 2020 (Act 1058) requires a firm of Chartered Accountants to be registered as a sole proprietorship or partnership but not as a limited liability company.

Required:

Discuss FOUR potential issues with audit firms registering as limited liability companies.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Mar 2025 – L3 – Q5 – Related Party Transactions"

AAA – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q1a – Ethical Issues in Audit Engagements

Ethical issues and professional conduct in an audit engagement involving conflict of interest.

You are the Audit Partner of a mid-sized audit firm, Amoah Sonko and Associates. One of your major clients, Kudi LTD (Kudi), has approached you for a significant audit engagement. Kudi has been experiencing rapid growth and plans to get listed on the Ghana Alternative Market within the next year. During preliminary discussions, the Managing Director of Kudi, a friend, promised you a bonus if the audit report is completed quickly and is favourable, highlighting the company’s strengths.

In the course of the audit of Kudi, you came across a series of unusual financial transactions. These included large intercompany loans with its sister companies, other significant related-party transactions with the directors, and an unusually high volume of sales recorded a few days before the end of the financial year. Upon further investigation, your team found discrepancies in inventory records and evidence of potential non-compliance with revenue recognition standards. The Finance Manager insists these transactions are legitimate and necessary for the company’s rapid growth.

Additionally, you noticed that Kudi was involved in a high-profile legal battle with a major competitor, which was not fully disclosed in the financial statements. The lawyer for Kudi insists that you omit this information from the audit report, arguing it would damage the company’s reputation and its plans to get listed on the Ghana Alternative Market.

Required:
i) Identify TWO potential ethical issues in the scenario and explain the potential impact on your professional conduct.                      ii) Identify the steps you should take to address the conflict of interest presented by the Managing Director’s offer. 
iii) Discuss the potential sanctions for accepting the Managing Director’s offer and providing a favourable audit report without proper verification. 
iv) Evaluate the impact of the undisclosed legal battle on Kudi LTD’s financial statements and the upcoming initial public offer.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q1a – Ethical Issues in Audit Engagements"

AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – AII – Q20 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Define the situation where an auditor's role as a rival to the client impairs objectivity.

A situation which puts the auditor as opponent or rival of the client and which may impair his objectivity is termed…………………….

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2013 – L3 – AII – Q20 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Discuss ethical and legal obligations of auditors regarding independence, confidentiality, money laundering, and client competition safeguards.

As an Audit Manager in a big audit firm in Nigeria, you were opportuned to attend a conference on Professional Ethics and Anti-Money Laundering in New York. On your return, one of the audit seniors went through the presentations and asked questions on some of the statements she noted in the presentations.

You are required to explain the following statements to her:

a. A good Auditor is an independent auditor. (5 Marks)
b. The Accountant’s normal professional duty of confidentiality to clients is not an adequate defence where money laundering is involved. (5 Marks)
c. Specific obligations for detecting and reporting suspicions of money laundering are placed on professional firms. (5 Marks)
d. A firm might act for two clients that are in direct competition with each other where there are acceptable safeguards. (5 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q2 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy

Evaluate internal and external business risks and outline pre-engagement activities for Sunsit Manufacturers Ltd.

The auditors of Sunsit Manufacturers Limited had disagreements with the company on various issues. This came to a climax with the withholding of a part of the payment of the last audit fees. The auditors had also been disenchanted with the undue pressures of management and have decided that, as a result of this and the withheld fees, they would disengage from the client.

The company’s chairman, in consideration of past issues, has considered the size of the audit firm as being partly responsible for its inability to manage adequately the pressures from the company’s accounting and management team. He has subsequently approached your firm for a change, and the partners have accepted the engagement despite the predecessor auditor’s declaration of the forfeiture of the firm’s outstanding fees and no further involvement with the client and issues relating to the company.

Required:

a. Following the background to the client and the engagement, evaluate the internal and external business risks that need to be considered with respect to the client. (10 Marks)

b. Discuss the pre-engagement activities to be carried on the client. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2021 – L3 – Q2 – Advanced Audit Planning and Strategy"

AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Identifies a service inappropriate for an audit firm to provide due to independence and ethical concerns.

Which ONE of these services may not be appropriate for an audit firm?

  • A. Advising clients on corporate structures, recruitment, and other human capital needs
  • B. Giving necessary legal advice on tax returns including negotiation with the tax authorities
  • C. Acting as a receiver of the company’s operations on behalf of debenture holders and creditors of the company
  • D. Making detailed enquiries and gathering all necessary information to meet the clients’ specific needs
  • E. Advising clients on how best the business can be run and controlled including issues of accountability and management

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2011 – L3 – SA – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)

Evaluate ethical threats due to auditor relationships and actions, and recommend mitigations for compliance.

The following scenarios may threaten compliance with fundamental principles in auditing:

i. The audit supervisor is married to the daughter of the Managing Director of the client company;

ii. The audit firm’s Senior Partner holds shares in the client company;

iii. The assurance firm also provides valuation services, internal audit services, and taxation services to an assurance client;

iv. The assurance firm earns more than 50% of its annual revenue from one assurance client; and

v. The firm obtained motor vehicle financing from a client bank for its staff.

Required:

a. Explain why compliance with fundamental principles in auditing may be threatened in each of the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

b. Explain FIVE ethical requirements that would reduce or mitigate the threats to compliance with the fundamental principles in the above FIVE circumstances. (10 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2023 – L2 – Q3 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors (IESBA Code)"

MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance

Ethical and governance issues in appointing auditors with familial ties to company management.

ROC Company Plc. manufactures aluminium (stainless) household equipment. Its plant is located by Alobe river, which is the source of water for the community. The company currently has the largest share of the market on the West African Coast and plans to expand its operations to East African and South African markets.

At the 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM), shareholders approved the appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to the company. The Managing Partner of Adeola & Partners, Sir Segun Adeola, is a nephew of the Managing Director of ROC Company Plc. The appointment of Adeola & Partners as External Auditors to ROC Company was facilitated by the Managing Director, who did not disclose his relationship with Sir Segun Adeola to the company’s board.

At a recent board meeting, the Managing Director of ROC expressed concern that so much resources were expended towards satisfying the interest of the community at the expense of the company’s shareholders. According to him, shareholders are the primary stakeholders of the company, and their interest should be given the highest priority. He further opined that although other stakeholders are important to the company but only to the extent that ROC needs them. Consequently, the board resolved that henceforth, the company should not spend more than 0.5% of its Profit After Tax (PAT) on other stakeholders.

At the peak of the company’s production cycle, one of its underground waste tanks ruptured, and a large quantity of chemical waste leaked into Alobe river. This led to the destruction of aquatic life and contamination of neighbouring farmlands. This catastrophic event devastated the community as many farmers and fishermen lost their sources of livelihood. The community’s major source of drinking water was also contaminated.

The leadership of Alobe River Community Association approached the management of ROC Company Plc. and requested them to pay huge sums as compensation to the affected people and also to construct ten bore holes for the community. The management, however, informed the community leaders that based on the resolution of their board, expenditure on the issue would be limited to only 0.5% of profit after tax at the end of the year, which was projected to be far less than the amount of compensation demanded by the community. As a result, all discussions with the leadership of the community broke down.

The youths of the community responded with a sit-in protest, leading to a blockade of the company’s gate and disruption of its operations. The board of the company is now seeking immediate and amicable resolution of this problem.

While this was going on, the company suffered a major fire outbreak in its second factory, destroying its main furnace, machines and a large quantity of its finished goods. Some of the workers were severely burnt while attempting to put out the fire at the factory’s major warehouse. This event culminated in production shutdown at the second factory and temporary disengagement of several skilled workers as well as some casual staff. Fortunately, the company is covered by comprehensive fire and workers compensation insurance policies with Nagode Risk and Life Assurance Plc.

Required:
a. As a Strategic Risk Consultant of ROC Company Plc. you are to evaluate the adequacy of the risk management processes, including its information and communication systems. (8 Marks)

b. Evaluate the company’s residual risks in contrast to the management’s risk appetite. (7 Marks)

c. Using the stakeholders theory, evaluate the Managing Director’s position. Are there other stakeholders important to the company? (9 Marks)

d. Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the scenario described above. (6 Marks)


Answer:

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "MGE – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q1 – Corporate Governance"

AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors

Explain threats to auditor independence and provide examples of each.

The ICAN Professional Code of Conduct and Guide for Members gives a list of threats to auditors’ independence, which may impair integrity, objectivity, or the good reputation of the profession.

Required:

Explain the following threats and give TWO examples each of circumstances that may lead to the threats:

a. Self-Interest (3 Marks)

b. Self-Review (3 Marks)

c. Advocacy (3 Marks)

d. Familiarity (3 Marks)

e. Intimidation (3 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "AA – Nov 2014 – L2 – Q5 – Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for Auditors"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan