Topic: International financial management

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q4c – Forward Rate Agreement for Interest Rate Risk Management

Calculation of settlement amount for FRA under different Ghana Reference Rate (GRR) scenarios.

The company has decided to use a Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) to manage its interest rate risk likely to arise from the short-term loan of GH¢15 million it intends to borrow in three months for a period of six months.

Required:

i) What is the purpose for a company to enter into an FRA arrangement? (2 marks)

ii) Calculate the amount of money that will be paid to settle the FRA at the beginning of the FRA period if, at the end of month 3, when the FRA becomes effective, the six-month Ghana Reference Rate (GRR) is as follows:

a) 37.50%
b) 28.50%

In each case, clearly state the party (i.e. FRA buyer or FRA seller) responsible for making the payment.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q4c – Forward Rate Agreement for Interest Rate Risk Management"

SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q4b – International Tax Considerations

Key tax issues for BOGML’s planned international expansion to minimize total group tax payable.

The company is planning to expand its operations to Tanzania and South Africa in 2026. As a result, transactions between the head office in Ghana and the prospective foreign subsidiaries will likely take place, leading to potential international tax implications.

Required:

Briefly identify and explain TWO key issues to consider for the company to minimise total tax payable on the group profits.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q4b – International Tax Considerations"

SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q2b – Integration/Responsiveness Matrix and Cost Reduction

Advising BOGML’s MD on the best international strategies under the IR Matrix to achieve cost reduction in expansion.

The Board of BOGML has approved the Managing Director’s proposal to expand operations into Tanzania and South Africa by 2026. A key strategic focus of the company has been cost reduction, due to the narrow profit margins prevalent in the industry.

Required:
Using the Integration/Responsiveness (IR) Matrix, advise Dr. Ayimadu Baffour on the two most suitable international strategies/choices that have a low requirement for local responsiveness but can effectively support his cost reduction objectives. Clearly identify and explain the two strategies within the IR Matrix that prioritize cost reduction.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q2b – Integration/Responsiveness Matrix and Cost Reduction"

SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q2a – Approaches to Risk Management

Discusses risk management approaches to address identified risks in BOGML.

Approaches to risk management in BOGML – Advice to the board of directors

The following are the risk management approaches that the board of BOGML can adopt to manage the following risks identified in the company:

Risk A

  • Description: Low probability but high impact, e.g., pandemics, natural disasters.
  • Approach: Risk Transfer or Risk Sharing
  • Since this risk has a low likelihood of occurring but can result in severe financial losses, the company should consider transferring this risk or sharing risk. This can be done through the company taking full or partial (i.e. sharing of risk) insurance policies specifically designed for catastrophic events, such as business interruption insurance, pandemic insurance, or property insurance that covers natural disasters. Since the impact will be high when the risk occurs, the company can take insurance to pass on the high impact on the company to the insurance company which has to compensate BOGML in the event that the risk does occur.
  • The risk could also be shared through BOGML forming partnerships and collaborating with other OMCs to undertake investment in their oil stations.
  • The company should also develop a disaster recovery and business continuity plan to manage potential impacts effectively.

Risk B

  • Description: High likelihood but low financial impact, e.g., labor turnover and software downtime due to internet instability.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – Nov 2024 – L3 – Q2a – Approaches to Risk Management"

FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4 – International Financial Management

Evaluate a foreign investment decision for Gugi Plc, including cash flow, tax, and exchange rate considerations.

Gugi Plc. is a highly successful manufacturing company operating in Nigeria. In addition to sales within Nigeria, the company also exports to a foreign country (with currency F$) along the ECOWAS sub-region. The export sales generate annual net cash inflow of ₦50,000,000.

Gugi Plc. is now considering whether to establish a factory in the foreign country and stop export from Nigeria to the country. The project is expected to cost F$1 billion, including F$200 million for working capital.

A suitable existing factory has been located, and production could commence immediately. A payment of F$950 million would be required immediately, with the remainder payable at the end of year one. The following additional information is available:

Details Figures
Annual production and sales 110,000 units
Unit selling price F$5,000
Unit variable cost F$2,000
Unit royalty payable to Gugi Plc ₦300
Incremental annual cash fixed costs F$50 million

Assume that the above cash items will remain constant throughout the expected life of the project of 4 years. At the end of year 4, it is estimated that the net realizable value of the non-current assets will be F$1.40 billion.

It is the policy of the company to remit the maximum funds possible to the parent (i.e., Gugi Plc.) at the end of each year. Assume that there are no legal complications to prevent this.

If the new factory is set up and export to the foreign country is stopped, it is expected that new export markets of a similar worth in North Africa could replace the existing exports. Production in Nigeria is at full capacity, and there are no plans for further capacity expansion.

Tax on the company’s profits is at a rate of 40% in both countries, payable one year in arrears. A double taxation agreement exists between Nigeria and the foreign country, and no double taxation is expected to arise. No withholding tax is levied on royalties payable from the foreign country to Nigeria.

Tax-allowable “depreciation” is at a rate of 25% on a straight-line basis on all non-current assets.

The Directors of Gugi Plc. believe that the appropriate risk-adjusted cost of capital of the project is 13%.

Annual inflation rates in Nigeria and the foreign country are currently 5.6% and 10%, respectively. These rates are expected to remain constant in the foreseeable future. The current spot exchange rate is F$1.60 = ₦1. You may assume that the exchange rate reflects the purchasing power parity theorem.

Required:

(a) Evaluate the proposed investment from the viewpoint of Gugi Plc.
Notes:

  • Show all workings and calculations to the nearest million.
  • State all reasonable assumptions. (18 Marks)

(b) State two further information and analysis that might be useful in evaluating this project. (2 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4 – International Financial Management"

FM – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q1 – International Financial Management

Evaluates a foreign investment project in Linder, with NPV, payback period, and real options for abandonment analyzed under two scenarios.

Assume today is November 20, 2019. In 2018, the Oyin Division of Aba plc successfully launched a new premium wine, “Aladun,” in Nigeria. The Divisional Board of Oyin Division is now considering plans put forward by the Divisional Marketing Manager to launch the full range of Aladun in another country, “Linder.” Linder has the Linderian dollar (L$) as its currency, and the launch is planned for January 1, 2020.

It is known that breaking into the Linderian market for fruit wine is challenging due to strong local brand loyalty. Initial market research based on free tasting sessions has been promising, though uncertainties remain. The biggest risk identified is the potential for a Nigerian competitor to enter the same market with a similar product.

Financial Data for the Project:

  • Initial market research for the Linderian market: N5 million (already spent).
  • Additional detailed market research and packaging design (if approved): N20 million.
  • Launch campaign (radio and TV advertising): N10 million.
  • Distribution center in Linder: L$84 million.

Operating cash flow forecasts for the year ending December 31, 2020, vary based on two scenarios:

  • Scenario A: Sales revenue L$100 million; costs L$10 million + N20 million.
  • Scenario B: Sales revenue L$55 million; costs L$10 million + N15 million.
  • Probability of occurrence: 70% for Scenario A, 30% for Scenario B.

Other relevant financial data:

  • Oyin Division’s project evaluation discount rate: 15%.
  • Project duration: 4 years.
  • Expected operating cash flow growth: 5% per year.
  • Residual value of the distribution center: L$52 million after 4 years.
  • Exchange rate: N1 = L$1.2000 on January 1, 2020 (strengthening by 2% per year).
  • Corporate tax rate in Nigeria: 35%.
  • Tax allowances on capital expenditure: 100% (tax-deductible in Nigeria).

Additional Option:

  • The project could be abandoned on January 1, 2021, with the distribution center sold for an estimated L$70 million if Scenario B occurs.

Required:

a. Ignoring the abandonment option: i. Calculate the NPV for the project as of January 1, 2020, for each scenario and the overall total expected NPV. (17 Marks) ii. Calculate the payback period for each scenario. (4 Marks) iii. Interpret your results. (4 Marks)

b. Evaluate the abandonment decision on January 1, 2021, if Scenario B occurs. (7 Marks)

c. Advise on how real options and other strategic financial issues may influence the investment decision. (8 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "FM – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q1 – International Financial Management"

SCS – MAR 2024 – L3 – Q5c – International financial management

Evaluate the factors restricting foreign investment despite potential good returns.

With reference to Option Three, evaluate the factors that restrict foreign investment despite the perceived potential for good returns. 

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – MAR 2024 – L3 – Q5c – International financial management"

SCS – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q7 – International financial management

Explain how to handle ethical conflicts and assess the impact of transaction risk on GGOH’s ability to repay its loan.

ABGL that the loan will be paid within the period specified.

Required:
i) In reference to the IFAC suggested model for dealing with ethical conflicts and using your judgement, explain how you will undertake this assignment with integrity. (5 marks)

ii) Assess the impact of transaction risk on the ability of GGOH to repay its loan, with relevant calculations. (5 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – Nov 2020 – L3 – Q7 – International financial management"

SCS – May 2020 – L3 – Q6 – International Financial Management

Explain a suitable foreign currency risk hedging method for Customer Focused Ltd in relation to the Look and Like Ltd contract.

Customer Focused Ltd has received a proposal from a potential supplier, Look and Like
Ltd, to provide fresh produce (Exhibit 2a) and is considering whether to accept. Kpakpo
Armah has written a note (Exhibit 2b) about Look and Like Ltd.
Required:
Using the information available, including information you feel relevant from your answer
to Section A:

Describe an appropriate foreign currency risk management hedging method for the risk the company might face in the future as described in Exhibit 2b.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – May 2020 – L3 – Q6 – International Financial Management"

SCS – July 2023 – L3 – Q5a – International financial management

Calculate the group profits from the sale of HVSC based on the transfer price set at market price and 25% of Utopia's unit cost.

As the Head of Finance of SavvyTech plc, the Director of Finance and Operations has assigned you to use the forecast data (Table 8) and the “additional information” provided to calculate the following to support engagement by the management team with the Board.

Required:
Calculate the group profits to be realised from the sale of HVSC, if the transfer price for the component is set at its market price, which is GH¢26 per unit (total Ghana cost) plus 25% of Utopia’s unit cost.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – July 2023 – L3 – Q5a – International financial management"

SCS – March 2023 – L3 – Q8 – International financial management

Discusses governance structure in terms of the separation of roles between the chairman and the CEO in line with the UK and Ghana Codes of Best Practices.

Dr. Kingsley Tettey is the Chairman of the 4-member board of directors, and Dr. Joy Tettey is the Medical Director. Clearly, the Chairman is not the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or Medical Director of LCH.

Required:
Discuss what the Ghana Code of Best Practices and the UK Corporate Governance Code state about this governance structure.
(8 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – March 2023 – L3 – Q8 – International financial management"

SCS – March 2023 – L3 – Q6 – International financial management

Explains the financial reporting implications of debt exchange and compares investing in bonds versus shares

LCH has invested GH¢1,000,000 in a 5-year Government of Ghana Bond with a coupon rate of 20%. As a result of the Government of Ghana DDE programme, LCH has no option but to exchange the old bond with the new bond.

Required:
a) Explain FIVE (5) financial reporting implications of the debt exchange on the financial statements of LCH as at 31 December 2022.
(10 marks)

b) Discuss FOUR (4) advantages and TWO (2) main disadvantages of investing in bonds rather than shares.
(10 marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "SCS – March 2023 – L3 – Q6 – International financial management"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan