- 20 Marks
AAA – L3 – Q37 – Evaluation and review
Question
You are the manager in charge of the audit of Benson Manufacturing. Your subsequent events review for the year ended 30 June 20X8 has identified the following events, all of which took place after the date of the financial statements:
(1) A third of the sales force was made redundant. Provision has been made in the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X8 for redundancy payments of C500,000.
(2) One of Benson Manufacturing’s largest customers, Venture Retail, notified its intention to go into liquidation with an outstanding receivable of C250,000. The directors consider that the current general provision for irrecoverable receivables will cover any potential loss.
(3) A writ has been issued against the company by a former sales director who is claiming C120,000 for breach of his service agreement following his dismissal during the year ended 30 June 20X8. No provision has been made in the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X8 in respect of this claim.
(4) A fire at the company’s warehouse destroyed its entire inventory. The inventories had a book value of C2 million. This loss has not been included in the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X8.
Required
State the enquiries you would make and the evidence you would seek in order to reach a conclusion on the accounting treatment of the above in the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X8.
Answer
Subsequent Events Review for Benson Manufacturing
- Redundancy of Sales Force (C500,000 Provision)
- Enquiries:
- Confirm with management the date the redundancy decision was communicated to employees and whether it was before or after 30 June 20X8.
- Discuss the basis for the C500,000 provision, including the number of employees affected, terms of redundancy payments, and any legal or contractual obligations.
- Enquire about any subsequent changes to the redundancy plan post-year-end.
- Evidence:
- Review board minutes or management correspondence approving the redundancy plan.
- Obtain redundancy agreements or contracts with affected employees.
- Verify calculations of the provision, including payroll records and severance terms.
- Check post-year-end payments or accruals to confirm the provision’s accuracy.
- Accounting Treatment: If the redundancy was announced and a reliable estimate was possible before 30 June 20X8, the provision is appropriate (IAS 37). If post-year-end, it is a non-adjusting event requiring disclosure only.
- Enquiries:
- Venture Retail Liquidation (C250,000 Receivable)
- Enquiries:
- Confirm with management the timing of Venture Retail’s liquidation notification.
- Discuss the adequacy of the general provision for irrecoverable receivables and its coverage for this specific loss.
- Enquire about any recoveries expected from the liquidation process.
- Evidence:
- Obtain the liquidation notice or correspondence from Venture Retail.
- Review the ageing of receivables and the general provision calculation.
- Assess historical recovery rates for similar liquidations and any legal advice on recoverability.
- Perform a post-year-end review of cash receipts or updates from the liquidator.
- Accounting Treatment: If the liquidation was announced post-year-end, it is a non-adjusting event (IAS 10) but may require disclosure if material. If conditions existed at year-end (e.g., Venture Retail’s financial distress), a specific provision or write-off may be needed (IFRS 9).
- Enquiries:
- Writ from Former Sales Director (C120,000 Claim)
- Enquiries:
- Discuss with management the circumstances of the dismissal and the basis for the claim.
- Enquire about legal advice received on the likelihood of the claim succeeding and the estimated liability.
- Confirm the timing of the writ issuance relative to 30 June 20X8.
- Evidence:
- Review the writ and any related legal correspondence.
- Obtain a lawyer’s letter assessing the probability of the claim’s success and potential financial impact.
- Check board minutes or management discussions regarding the dismissal and claim.
- Assess any similar past claims and their outcomes.
- Accounting Treatment: If the dismissal occurred during the year and a probable outflow is likely (IAS 37), a provision should be made. If the writ was issued post-year-end and no obligation existed at year-end, it is a non-adjusting event requiring disclosure if material.
- Enquiries:
- Warehouse Fire (C2 million Inventory Loss)
- Enquiries:
- Confirm with management the date of the fire and the extent of inventory destruction.
- Enquire about insurance coverage, claims filed, and expected recoveries.
- Discuss the valuation method for the lost inventory and its impact on the financial statements.
- Evidence:
- Obtain a fire incident report or third-party confirmation (e.g., fire department).
- Review insurance policies and correspondence with insurers regarding claims.
- Verify the inventory valuation at 30 June 20X8 through stock count records or valuation reports.
- Assess post-year-end updates on insurance recoveries or loss adjustments.
- Accounting Treatment: The fire is a non-adjusting event (IAS 10) as it occurred after 30 June 20X8. No adjustment is required in the financial statements, but disclosure is needed due to materiality. Any insurance recovery should be assessed separately (IAS 37).
- Enquiries:
Conclusion:
- The redundancy provision is likely appropriate if conditions were met pre-year-end.
- The receivable may require a specific provision if impairment indicators existed at year-end.
- The legal claim may need a provision or disclosure based on probability and timing.
- The inventory loss is a non-adjusting event requiring disclosure only.
- Tags: Audit Evidence, Contingencies, Financial Statements, Inventory, Provisions, Receivables, Subsequent events
- Level: Level 3
- Topic: Evaluation and review
- Uploader: Salamat Hamid