An agreement obtained under a threat to seize goods would be set aside by the court for:

A. Mistake
B. Misrepresentation
C. Undue influence
D. Breach of influence
E. Duress

E. Duress
Explanation:
The correct answer is E because, under contract law, duress involves threats or actual harm that coerce a party into agreeing to terms they would not have otherwise accepted. The agreement in question would be set aside due to duress, as the threat to seize goods constitutes coercion.