Question Tag: Statutory Protection

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

POB – LP OCT 2022 – L3 – Q4 – Collecting Bank Duties and Protections in Cheque Collection

A bank collects a stolen cheque for a fraudulent customer, opens an account after clearance, allows withdrawal, and faces a lawsuit from the drawer; questions cover definition of collecting bank, duties, statutory protections, common law defences, and applicability of protection.

As a new Manager at the Edubiase branch of your bank, in the course of your work, your branch has collected a cheque for the account of a customer who turned out not to be the true owner of the cheque. Your Operations Manager did not open the account straightaway but for reasons unknown to you, he told the customer Timothy Ankrah that the bank would not open the account immediately but would only open the account if the cheque of GHC 500,000 the prospective account holder presented was cleared. After the cheque had cleared, your Operations Manager proceeded to open the account and the very next day, Timothy withdrew an amount of GHC 400,000.00 which he claimed was for the purchase of a car.

It transpires that the cheque had been stolen and Timothy was only an impersonator. Timothy is nowhere to be found.

The drawer of the cheque Mr. Banson has sued the bank for refund of the monies he has lost.

(a) What is a collecting bank? [2 Marks]

(b) Mention three duties of a collecting bank. [3 Marks]

(c) Mention and explain the statutory protection available to a collecting bank that collects a cheque for a party who is not the true owner of the cheque? [9 Marks] (d) What are the common law defences available to a collecting bank? [4 Marks]

(e) Will the bank be able to avail itself of the statutory protection? [2 Marks]

[Total marks:20]

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "POB – LP OCT 2022 – L3 – Q4 – Collecting Bank Duties and Protections in Cheque Collection"

LRB – APR 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Bank’s Defences in Cheque Forgery Dispute

Explain the bank's potential defences using statute and case law if a company disputes debits from forged cheques paid by the bank, where signatures matched records but proceeds went to an unauthorized messenger.

The Lambusie Branch of ADES BANK LTD holds an account in the name of the Lambusie Cotton Ginneries Ltd (LCG Ltd). The mandate on the account required that the signatures of any two of the four Directors of the company could constitute enough authorization for the bank to honour cheques drawn on the account. Between 15th February 2020 and 18th May 2020, the Lambusie Branch honoured 30 cheques drawn on the account with a total value of GHS $47,412.40$. The signatures on those cheques compared favourably with those you hold in your records. In the employ of LCG Ltd was one Kofi Brokeman, who was a messenger attached to the Finance Department. Kofi Brokeman’s duties included going to the bank to cash and deposit cheques and collecting bank statements and cheque books. The proceeds of all 30 cheques were paid to Kofi Brokeman. A week ago, LCG Ltd wrote a letter to your branch at Lambusie disputing the debits and asking for reimbursement of the proceeds of GHS47,412.40 as those debits were without the authority of the signatories to the account. The Manager of the branch, Jacob Okromouth, in his response to the letter, did not deny paying those cheques and insisted that if the signatures were forgeries, then it was the complainant who failed in its duty of care to refrain from drawing cheques in such a manner that facilitated fraud and forgery. The branch Manager contended that LCG Ltd had been negligent in failing to scrutinize its monthly statements and informing the Bank in a timely manner of the forgeries. In any case, concluded Jacob Okromouth, the signatures on those 30 cheques were so similar to those of the authorized signatories on the account that they had not been negligent by mistaking them to be those of the authorized signatories of the Directors of LCG Ltd. Aggrieved by the response of the Branch, LCG Ltd has instructed its Lawyers, AZANTILOW CHAMBERS, to write to the Head Office of the ADES Bank, where you are the Legal Officer in charge of Branch Operations. The Lawyers of LCG Ltd have given you a week within which to reimburse their clients or face them in Court. Using statute and case law, explain if the ADES Bank has any defences if the case goes to full trial?

(20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "LRB – APR 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Bank’s Defences in Cheque Forgery Dispute"

POB – LP OCT 2022 – L3 – Q4 – Collecting Bank Duties and Protections in Cheque Collection

A bank collects a stolen cheque for a fraudulent customer, opens an account after clearance, allows withdrawal, and faces a lawsuit from the drawer; questions cover definition of collecting bank, duties, statutory protections, common law defences, and applicability of protection.

As a new Manager at the Edubiase branch of your bank, in the course of your work, your branch has collected a cheque for the account of a customer who turned out not to be the true owner of the cheque. Your Operations Manager did not open the account straightaway but for reasons unknown to you, he told the customer Timothy Ankrah that the bank would not open the account immediately but would only open the account if the cheque of GHC 500,000 the prospective account holder presented was cleared. After the cheque had cleared, your Operations Manager proceeded to open the account and the very next day, Timothy withdrew an amount of GHC 400,000.00 which he claimed was for the purchase of a car.

It transpires that the cheque had been stolen and Timothy was only an impersonator. Timothy is nowhere to be found.

The drawer of the cheque Mr. Banson has sued the bank for refund of the monies he has lost.

(a) What is a collecting bank? [2 Marks]

(b) Mention three duties of a collecting bank. [3 Marks]

(c) Mention and explain the statutory protection available to a collecting bank that collects a cheque for a party who is not the true owner of the cheque? [9 Marks] (d) What are the common law defences available to a collecting bank? [4 Marks]

(e) Will the bank be able to avail itself of the statutory protection? [2 Marks]

[Total marks:20]

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "POB – LP OCT 2022 – L3 – Q4 – Collecting Bank Duties and Protections in Cheque Collection"

LRB – APR 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Bank’s Defences in Cheque Forgery Dispute

Explain the bank's potential defences using statute and case law if a company disputes debits from forged cheques paid by the bank, where signatures matched records but proceeds went to an unauthorized messenger.

The Lambusie Branch of ADES BANK LTD holds an account in the name of the Lambusie Cotton Ginneries Ltd (LCG Ltd). The mandate on the account required that the signatures of any two of the four Directors of the company could constitute enough authorization for the bank to honour cheques drawn on the account. Between 15th February 2020 and 18th May 2020, the Lambusie Branch honoured 30 cheques drawn on the account with a total value of GHS $47,412.40$. The signatures on those cheques compared favourably with those you hold in your records. In the employ of LCG Ltd was one Kofi Brokeman, who was a messenger attached to the Finance Department. Kofi Brokeman’s duties included going to the bank to cash and deposit cheques and collecting bank statements and cheque books. The proceeds of all 30 cheques were paid to Kofi Brokeman. A week ago, LCG Ltd wrote a letter to your branch at Lambusie disputing the debits and asking for reimbursement of the proceeds of GHS47,412.40 as those debits were without the authority of the signatories to the account. The Manager of the branch, Jacob Okromouth, in his response to the letter, did not deny paying those cheques and insisted that if the signatures were forgeries, then it was the complainant who failed in its duty of care to refrain from drawing cheques in such a manner that facilitated fraud and forgery. The branch Manager contended that LCG Ltd had been negligent in failing to scrutinize its monthly statements and informing the Bank in a timely manner of the forgeries. In any case, concluded Jacob Okromouth, the signatures on those 30 cheques were so similar to those of the authorized signatories on the account that they had not been negligent by mistaking them to be those of the authorized signatories of the Directors of LCG Ltd. Aggrieved by the response of the Branch, LCG Ltd has instructed its Lawyers, AZANTILOW CHAMBERS, to write to the Head Office of the ADES Bank, where you are the Legal Officer in charge of Branch Operations. The Lawyers of LCG Ltd have given you a week within which to reimburse their clients or face them in Court. Using statute and case law, explain if the ADES Bank has any defences if the case goes to full trial?

(20 Marks)

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "LRB – APR 2023 – L2 – Q1 – Bank’s Defences in Cheque Forgery Dispute"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan