Question Tag: Fair Value

Search 500 + past questions and counting.

CR – May 2015 – L3 – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Corporate Reporting

Analyze the financial reporting needs and efficiency challenges of not-for-profit organizations, including asset valuation at cost vs. fair value.

Question

NICE & DICE

NICE & DICE is a large charity located in Abuja and set up to provide support and assistance to disadvantaged people in major cities. Most of the charity’s income comes from members of the public through direct cash collections and regular monthly payments from donors. The other source of funding comes from government bodies who give grants to support specific projects that are recognized as being beneficial to the public good.

The charity publishes a detailed annual report. Performance is described largely in terms of an analysis of income received and the manner in which it has been spent. The trustees are concerned that this type of analysis does not really reflect the performance of the charity. They would like to report performance in terms of the work done rather than in terms of cash inflows and outflows. They want donors to appreciate how efficient the charity is.

The statement of financial position of the charity is a typical one for a large organization. NICE & DICE owns numerous properties in Abuja, some of which have been owned for many years. These are shown at historical cost less depreciation. The trustees do not wish to revalue the properties because this will create the impression that the charity is wealthy and that it does not require further financial support.

Required:
(a) Prepare a report to the trustees of Nice & Dice advising them on the reasons why specialized entities are required to publish detailed information about their activities. (5 Marks)
(b) Analyze the problems of quantifying and reporting the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations such as Nice & Dice. (5 Marks)
(c) Discuss the decision of the trustees to value its properties at cost less depreciation rather than at fair value. (5 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Charity Reporting, Efficiency Measurement, Fair Value, Historical Cost, Not-for-Profit Reporting
Level: Level 3

Topic: Ethical Issues in Corporate Reporting

AT – Nov 2016 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Tax Planning and Management

Define fair value, determine fair value for a product in principal or non-principal markets, and compute fair value of land under IFRS 13.

Question

a. Prior to the advent of IFRS 13, many standards such as IAS 16, IAS 38, IAS 40, and IAS 39, among others, required the use of fair value. These various requirements have been harmonized with the introduction of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.

Required:
Define fair value in accordance with IFRS 13. (2 Marks)

b. One of the companies formally operating in Nigeria that had recently relocated its operations to Ghana as a result of the challenging business environment in Nigeria has access to both Lagos and Accra markets for its product. The product sells at slightly different prices (in naira) in the two active markets. An entity enters into transactions in both markets and can access the price in those markets for the product at the measurement date as follows:

Market	Lagos Market (₦’000)	Accra Market (₦’000)
Sale Price	260	250
Transaction Cost	(30)	(10)
Transport Cost	(20)	(20)
Net Price Received	210	220

Required:
i. Briefly explain the principal market of an asset in accordance with IFRS 13 and determine what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if the Lagos market were the principal market.

(4 Marks)

ii. How is fair value determined in the absence of a principal market and what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if no principal market could be identified? (4 Marks)

c. Megida Plc, a public limited liability company, has just acquired some hectares of land in Abuja earmarked by the government for an economic empowerment program of citizens given the harsh economic environment in Nigeria and so is only meant for commercial purposes. The fair value of the land if used for commercial purposes is ₦100 million. If the land is used for commercial purposes, it is expected that it will result in reducing unemployment. This will attract a tax credit annually, which is based upon the lower of 15% of the fair market value of the land or ₦10,000,000 at the current tax rate. The current tax rate as fixed by the government is 20%.

Megida Plc has determined that, given the nature of Abuja’s land, market participants would consider that it could have an alternative use for residential purposes. The fair value of the land Megida Plc has just acquired for residential purposes before associated costs is estimated to be ₦148 million. In order to transform the land from its commercial purposes to residential use, there are estimated legal costs of ₦4,000,000, a project viability analysis cost of ₦6,000,000, and costs of demolition of the commercial buildings of ₦2,000,000.

In addition, permission for residential use has not been formally given by Abuja Municipal Authority. This has created uncertainty in the minds of market participants. Consequently, the market participants have indicated that the fair value of the land, after the above costs, would be discounted by 20% because of the risk of not obtaining the planning permission from Abuja Municipal Authority.

Required:
Discuss the way in which Megida Plc should compute the fair value of the Abuja land with reference to the principles of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.

(10 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Alternate Use, Fair Value, IFRS 13, Principal Market, Risk Discount
Level: Level 3

Topic: Tax Planning and Management
Series: NOV 2016

CR – May 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Share-Based Payments (IFRS 2)

Discuss how the SARs granted by Yerokun Ltd should be accounted for under IFRS 2 and IFRS 13 from the grant date to April 30, 2014.

Question

On May 1, 2011, Yerokun Limited granted 500 share appreciation rights (SARs) to its 300 managers. All of the rights vested on April 30, 2013, but they can be exercised from May 1, 2013, to April 30, 2015. At the grant date, the value of each SAR was ₦10 and it was estimated that 5% of the managers would leave during the vesting period. The fair value of the SARs is as follows:

Date	Fair Value of SAR
April 30, 2012	₦9
April 30, 2013	₦11
April 30, 2014	₦12

All of the managers who were expected to leave employment did not leave the company as expected before April 30, 2013. On April 30, 2015, 60 managers exercised their options when the intrinsic value of the right was ₦10.50 and were paid.

Yerokun Limited is confused as to whether to account for SARs under IFRS 2 Share-Based Payment or IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and would like to be advised as to how the SARs should have been accounted for from the grant date to April 30, 2014.

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, IFRS 13, IFRS 2, SARs, Share Appreciation Rights, Vesting Period
Level: Level 3

Topic: Share-Based Payments (IFRS 2)

CR – May 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Identify the fair value hierarchies under IFRS 13 and distinguish between principal and most advantageous markets.

Question

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) aims at enhancing the guidance available for assessing fair value in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. To this end, fair value measurements are categorized into a three-level hierarchy, based on the type of inputs to the valuation techniques used in IFRS 13. IFRS uses the terms principal or most advantageous market.

Required:

(i) What are the fair value hierarchies under IFRS 13? (3 Marks)

(ii) Distinguish between the principal and most advantageous market and state how price is determined in the principal market taking into consideration transport and transaction costs. (5 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, Hierarchy, IFRS 13, Market, Price determination
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

CR – Nov 2016 – L1 – SB – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Discuss fair value principles, principal market, and valuation adjustments under IFRS 13.

Question

a. Prior to the advent of IFRS 13, many standards such as IAS 16, IAS 38, IAS 40, and IAS 39 among others required the use of fair value. These various requirements have been harmonized with the introduction of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.

Required:
Define fair value in accordance with IFRS 13. (2 Marks)

b. One of the companies formerly operating in Nigeria that had recently relocated its operation to Ghana as a result of the challenging business environment in Nigeria has access to both Lagos and Accra markets for its product. The product sells at slightly different prices (in naira) in the two active markets. An entity enters into transactions in both markets and can access the price in those markets for the product at the measurement date as follows:

Market	Lagos (N’000)	Accra (N’000)
Sale Price	260	250
Transaction Cost	(30)	(10)
Transport Cost	(20)	(20)
Net Price	210	220

ii. How is fair value determined in the absence of a principal market and what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if no principal market could be identified? (4 Marks)

c. Megida Plc, a public limited liability company, has just acquired some hectares of land in Abuja earmarked by the government for economic empowerment programs. The land is expected to be used for commercial purposes. The fair value of the land if used for commercial purposes is N100 million, which includes tax credits.

Market participants consider alternative use for residential purposes, with an estimated fair value of N148 million, adjusted for:

Legal Costs: N4 million
Viability Analysis Costs: N6 million
Demolition Costs: N2 million
Planning Permission Uncertainty: 20% risk discount.

Required:
Discuss how Megida Plc should compute the fair value of the Abuja land with reference to IFRS 13 principles. (10 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, IFRS 13, Measurement Methods, Non-Financial Assets, Principal Market
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)
Series: NOV 2016

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Advise on measuring the fair value of land for residential purposes in financial statements.

Question

Kantala Limited is a company based in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital. It uses the revaluation model for its non-current assets. Kantala Limited has several plots of farmland which are unproductive.

The company feels that the land would have more value if it were used for residential purposes.

There are several potential purchasers for the land, but planning permission has not yet been granted by the Abeokuta Planning Authority for use of the land for residential purposes.

However, preliminary enquiries with the planning authority seem to indicate that the planning permission may be granted. Additionally, the Ogun State Government has recently indicated that some agricultural land should be used for residential purposes.

Required:

Advise Kantala Limited on how to measure the fair value of the land in its financial statements. (2 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Agricultural Land, Fair Value, IFRS 13, Revaluation Model
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Evaluate fair value relevance versus historical cost and explain valuation techniques under IFRS 13.

Question

a. Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. It focuses on assets and liabilities and on the exit (selling) price. It also takes into account market conditions at the measurement date. In other words, fair value measurement looks at the amount for which the holders of an asset could sell it and the amount which the holder of a liability would have to pay to transfer it.

Required:

i. Discuss the view that fair value is a more relevant measure to use in corporate reporting than historical cost. (4 Marks)

ii. Discuss the valuation techniques in fair value measurement in accordance with IFRS 13. (4 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, Historical Cost, IFRS 13, Valuation Techniques
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Discuss IFRS 13’s principles in computing fair value for land with alternative uses in Abuja.

Question

Megida Plc, a public limited liability company, has acquired hectares of land in Abuja designated for economic empowerment programs, intended for commercial use. The fair value of the land for commercial purposes is estimated at N100 million. Utilizing the land for commercial purposes would contribute to reducing unemployment and attract an annual tax credit, which is based on the lower of 15% of the fair market value or N10,000,000, at a 20% tax rate.

Megida Plc has also considered an alternative use of the land for residential purposes, a choice market participants may support. The fair value of the land for residential purposes is estimated to be N148 million, excluding certain associated costs such as:

Legal costs: N4,000,000
Project viability analysis: N6,000,000
Demolition of commercial structures: N2,000,000

Due to uncertainty in obtaining residential use permission from the Abuja Municipal Authority, market participants would discount the fair value by 20%.

Required: Discuss the way in which Megida Plc should compute the fair value of the Abuja land with reference to the principles of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. (10 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, Highest and Best Use, IFRS 13, Market Participants, Risk Adjustment
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4b -Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Determine the principal market and fair value measurement for product sales in the Lagos and Accra markets.

Question

One of the companies formally operating in Nigeria that had recently relocated its operations to Ghana, as a result of the challenging business environment in Nigeria, has access to both the Lagos and Accra markets for its product. The product sells at slightly different prices (in naira) in the two active markets. An entity enters into transactions in both markets and can access the price in those markets for the product at the measurement date as follows:

	Lagos Market (N’000)	Accra Market (N’000)
Sale Price	260	250
Transaction Cost	(30)	(10)
Transport Cost	(20)	(20)
Net Price Received	210	220

Required:

i. Briefly explain the principal market of an asset in accordance with IFRS 13 and determine what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if the Lagos market were the principal market. (4 Marks)

ii. How is fair value determined in the absence of a principal market, and what fair value would be used to measure the sale of the above product if no principal market could be identified? (4 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Asset Valuation, Fair Value, IFRS 13, Most Advantageous Market, Principal Market
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4a – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Define fair value as per IFRS 13, addressing the standardized approach to valuation.

Question

Prior to the advent of IFRS 13, many standards such as IAS 16, IAS 38, IAS 40, and IAS 39 required the use of fair value. These various requirements have been harmonized with the introduction of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.

Required: Define fair value in accordance with IFRS 13. (2 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Asset Valuation, Fair Value, IFRS 13, Liability Valuation
Level: Level 3

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

AAA – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Examining professional skepticism, its necessity across audit stages, and its application in audits.

Question

As a result of recent global financial crises, audit inspection reports in various jurisdictions have noted areas requiring professional judgment. Such areas include fair value, related party transactions, and going concern assessments, where regulators and oversight bodies believe that auditors should clearly demonstrate professional scepticism.

Required:

a. Explain the term “Professional Scepticism.” (3 Marks)

b. Identify the stages in the audit process where professional scepticism is necessary. (3 Marks)

c. Discuss three ways in which the application of professional scepticism can be demonstrated by the auditor. (9 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Audit Judgment, Audit Process, Fair Value, Going Concern, Professional scepticism, Related Party Transactions
Level: Level 3

Topic: Ethical Issues in Auditing

CR – Nov 2023 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)

Discuss IFRS 9 derecognition rules, trade receivables factoring, and FVTOCI investment strategy for Pelumi Limited.

Question

a. Derecognition of financial instruments is the removal of a previously recognised financial asset or liability from an entity’s statement of financial position.

Required:
Discuss the rules of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments relating to the derecognition of a financial asset. (10 Marks)

b. Royal Business Limited (RBL) held a portfolio of trade receivables with a carrying amount of N40 million as of May 31, 2022. At that date, the entity entered into a factoring agreement with Hexlinks Bank Limited (HBL), whereby it transfers the receivables in exchange for N36 million in cash. Royal Business Limited has agreed to reimburse the factor (HBL) for any shortfall between the amount collected and N36 million. Once the receivables have been collected, any amount above N36 million, less interest on this amount, will be repaid to Royal Business Limited. Royal Business Limited has derecognised the receivables and charged N4 million as a loss to profit or loss.

Required:
Explain how the rules of derecognition of the financial assets will affect the portfolio of trade receivables in Royal Business Limited’s financial statements. (3 Marks)

c. During the year 2021, Pelumi Limited invested in 800,000 shares in an NGX quoted company. The shares were purchased at N4.54 per share. The broker collected a commission of 1% on the transaction. Pelumi Limited elected to measure their shares at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). The quoted share price as of December 31, 2021, was N4.22 to N4.26. Pelumi Limited decided to adopt a ‘sale and buy back’ strategy for the shares to realise a tax loss and therefore sold the shares at the market price on December 31, 2021, and bought the same quantity back the following day. The market price did not change on January 1, 2022. The broker collected a 1% commission on both transactions.

Required:
Explain the IFRS 9 accounting treatment of the above shares in the financial statement of Pelumi Limited for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Note: Show relevant calculations. (7 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Derecognition, Factoring Agreement, Fair Value, Financial instruments, FVTOCI, IFRS 9, Investment strategy, Shares, Tax Loss, Trade receivables
Level: Level 3

Topic: Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)
Series: NOV 2023

CR – Nov 2022 – L3 – Q3 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Evaluate impairment of a CGU for Evo Plc, considering fair value, cost to sell, and cash flows.

Question

Evo Plc acquired a cash-generating unit (CGU) several years ago. The directors of Evo Plc were concerned that the value of the CGU had declined because of a reduction in sales due to new competitors entering the market. At February 28, 2021, the carrying amounts of the assets in the CGU before any impairment testing were:

Asset	Carrying Amount (N’m)
Goodwill	3
Property, Plant and Equipment	10
Other Assets	19
Total	32

The fair values of the property, plant, and equipment and the other assets at February 28, 2021, were N10 million and N17 million, respectively, and their costs to sell were N100,000 and N300,000, respectively. The CGU’s cash flow forecasts for the next five years are as follows:

Date (Year Ended)	Pre-tax Cash Flow (N’m)	Post-tax Cash Flow (N’m)
28 February 2022	8	5
28 February 2023	7	5
28 February 2024	5	3
28 February 2025	3	1.5
28 February 2026	13	10

The pre-tax discount rate for the CGU is 8%, and the post-tax discount rate is 6%. Evo Plc has no plan to expand the capacity of the CGU and believes that a reorganisation would bring cost savings, but as yet, no plan has been approved. The directors of Evo Plc need advice as to whether the CGU’s value is impaired.

The following extract from a table of present value factors has been provided:

Year	Discount Rate 6%	Discount Rate 8%
1	0.9434	0.9259
2	0.8900	0.8573
3	0.8396	0.7938
4	0.7921	0.7350
5	0.7473	0.6806

Required:
a. How is impairment loss determined and accounted for by a business entity? (6 Marks)
b. Advise the directors of Evo Plc on:
i. Whether the CGU’s value is impaired. (7 Marks)
ii. How the transactions above should be treated in its financial statements in accordance with the provisions of IAS 36 – Impairment of Assets. (7 Marks)
(Total 20 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Cash-Generating Unit, Fair Value, Financial Reporting, Impairment, Value in Use
Level: Level 3

Topic: Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)
Series: NOV 2022

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7b – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)

Calculate amortised cost and fair value of a financial liability issued by Anifowose Plc.

Question

Anifowose Plc issued a debt instrument at its fair value of N100 million on January 1, 2013. The debt instrument is to mature in 2017. It has a principal amount of N125 million and carries a fixed interest rate of 4.72%, which is paid annually. The effective interest rate is 10%, and on December 31, 2015, it had a fair value of 105 for every N10 nominal value. The company makes up its accounts to December 31 every year.

Required:

i. Show your computation schedule for the amortised cost of the financial liability up to December 31, 2015, on the assumption that the financial liability is valued at amortised cost.

ii. What is the value of the financial liability as of December 31, 2015, if the fair value option is adopted by Anifowose Plc?

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Amortised Cost, Fair Value, Financial Liability, Financial Reporting, IAS 39
Level: Level 2

Topic: Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)
Series: MAY 2016

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7a – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)

Explain fair value and amortised cost measurement of financial assets under IAS 39 with examples of applicable asset classes.

Question

After initial recognition in the Financial Statements, Financial Assets are measured either at fair value or amortised cost according to the provisions of IAS 39 – Financial Instruments: Recognition & Measurement.

Required:

Briefly explain how fair value and amortised costs of financial assets are determined and give one example each of the class of financial assets that can be measured using the methods.

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Amortised Cost, Fair Value, Financial Assets, Financial Reporting, IAS 39
Level: Level 2

Topic: Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)
Series: MAY 2016

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q2a – Business Combinations (IFRS 3)

Calculate goodwill for a parent company's acquisition using both proportionate share and fair value methods.

Question

A Parent Company acquired 60% equity interest in a subsidiary company for N440 million. The market value of the net assets of the subsidiary on the acquisition date was N400 million. The parent company estimates that the full 100% interest in the subsidiary company would have cost N640 million.

Required:

Calculate the goodwill at acquisition date where non-controlling interest is measured:

i. As a proportionate share of the net assets of the subsidiary company.
ii. At fair value (the full goodwill method).

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Acquisition, Fair Value, Goodwill, Non-Controlling Interest
Level: Level 2

Topic: Business Combinations (IFRS 3)
Series: MAY 2016

FR – Nov 2022 – L2 – Q4c – IFRS 9 Financial Instrument Classes

Describe two classifications of financial instruments under IFRS 9, including criteria for measurement.

Question

Explain TWO classes of financial instruments in accordance with IFRS 9. (4 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Amortised Cost, Fair Value, Financial instruments, IFRS 9, Other Comprehensive Income
Level: Level 2

Topic: Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)
Series: NOV 2022

FR – May 2021 – L2 – Q2 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Analyze asset sale due to privatization, calculate impairment, and address valuation criteria per IAS 36.

Question

As a result of privatisation and commercialisation exercise currently going on in the country, the Ministry of Transport sold the assets and liabilities of the newly constructed standard gauge railway to a private company known as Stalus Rail Limited (SRL) to ensure smooth operations of the railway services by freeing it from government bureaucracy.

The summarised extracts of the statement of financial position at fair value of SRL on January 1, 2019, reflecting the terms and conditions of the sales agreement of the Transport Ministry are as follows:

N’m	Assets
Goodwill	150,000
Operating licence	900,000
Property – Train stations and land	225,000
Rail tracks and coaches	225,000
Two (2) train engines	750,000
Total Assets	2,250,000

Liabilities:

Sundry liabilities: Nil

The operating licence is for a ten-year period issued on January 1, 2019, by the Transport Ministry and is stated at cost. The carrying value of the property and rail track and coaches is based on value in use, while the engines are valued at their net selling prices.

On February 1, 2019, one of the train engines got damaged due to a technical fault from the manufacturer and was completely destroyed. The sale of the assets to SRL was without recourse to the Transport Ministry or the manufacturer of the engines.

In view of this, it was estimated that there would be reduced passenger capacity, and the estimated value in use of the whole train service business of SRL was assessed at N1,500 billion.

The number of passengers after one of the engines was damaged was below expectation, even allowing for the reduced capacity. Consequently, the value in use of SRL rail services was re-assessed on March 31, 2019, at N1,350 billion. On this date, SRL received an offer of N675 billion from Papaya Railway Services Limited (PRSL) for the operating licence (since it is transferable). The realisable value of the other assets has not changed significantly.

Required:

a. Draft a memo addressed to the MD of Stalus Rail Limited (SRL) explaining the basis of allocating an impairment loss to the assets of a cash-generating unit in accordance with IAS 36 on impairment of assets.
(6 Marks)

b. Calculate the carrying amount of the assets of SRL Limited as at February 1, 2019, and March 1, 2019.
(10 Marks)

c. Explain TWO conditions that must exist before an impairment loss can be reversed.
(4 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Asset sale, Fair Value, Impairment, Privatization, Public Finance, Railway
Level: Level 2

Topic: Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)
Series: MAY 2021

FR – May 2024 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Consolidated Financial Statements

Preparation of consolidated financial statements, calculation of goodwill, and non-controlling interest.

Question

Olu Nigeria PLC has a subsidiary, Oba Limited, which it acquired on January 1, 2022. The financial statements of the companies are detailed below:

Statements of Profit or Loss for the year ended September 30, 2022

Additional Information:

Olu PLC acquired its 70% interest in Oba Limited through a share exchange of three shares in Olu PLC for every five shares in Oba Limited. At the acquisition date, the shares of Olu PLC were sold at ₦8.10 each on the Nigerian Exchange (NGX). The parent company has not recorded this share issue in its books.
At the acquisition date, the fair value of Oba Limited’s assets equaled their carrying amounts except for an item of plant, which had a fair value of N30,000,000 above its carrying amount. This fair value increase has not been adjusted in Oba Limited’s books. The plant’s remaining life at acquisition was five years.
During the year, Oba Limited transferred goods worth N40,000,000 to Olu PLC. These goods were invoiced at cost plus 25%, and only a quarter of them were sold by Olu PLC at year-end.
Included in the other income was N6,550,000 received from Oba Limited as interest paid on a loan granted by Olu PLC. The loan was fully repaid before September 30, 2022.
An impairment test revealed a goodwill impairment of N28,000,000 at the acquisition date.
It is the group’s policy to value non-controlling interests at fair value. The prevailing market price per ordinary share of Oba Limited at January 1, 2022, was ₦5.05.
The gain on the revaluation of property arose from an independent valuation of the group’s property in September 2022.
Administrative expenses of Oba Limited included N10,000,000 paid as management fees to Olu PLC, and the income has been duly recorded in Olu PLC’s books.
Income and expenses accrue evenly over the period.

Required:

a. Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for Olu Group for the year ended September 30, 2022. (12 Marks)

b. Calculate the goodwill on acquisition and the non-controlling interest at the reporting date. (4 Marks)

c. IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements states that a parent must present consolidated financial statements for its investments in subsidiaries.

Required:
State FOUR exceptions to this pronouncement. (4 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: consolidated financial statements, Elimination of Intragroup Transactions, Fair Value, Goodwill, IFRS 10, Non-Controlling Interest, Profit or Loss
Level: Level 2

Topic: Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS 10)
Series: MAY 2023

FR – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7b – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Explaining accounting treatment for investment property and calculating values for the financial statements.

Question

KOLA NITDA Nigeria Plc is a company engaged in the manufacturing of hand sanitizer to prevent Ebola disease. The following information relates to property owned by the company:

N’000
Land – Plot 404 Apapa Industrial Area
Building therein (acquired June 30, 2013)
Improvement to the building to extend rented floor capacity
Repairs and maintenance to investment property for the year
Rental received for the year

Approximately six percent of the property floor space is used as the administrative head office of the company. The property can be sold only as a complete unit. The remainder of the building is leased out under operating leases. The company provides lessees with security services.

The company values investment property using the fair value model on December 31, 2014, which is the company’s year-end. Tewogbade & Co. (an independent valuer) valued the property at N144,000,000 on that date.

Required:
i. Advise the Directors of KOLA NITDA Nigeria Plc on how the property should be treated in the financial statements of the company as at December 31, 2014 in order to ensure strict compliance with provisions of IAS 40. (5 Marks)
ii. Calculate the value of investment property that should be disclosed in the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2014 and the amount that should be charged to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the period then ended. (5 Marks)

Answer

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Tags: Fair Value, IAS 40, Investment Property, Property Accounting, Revaluation Model, Valuation
Level: Level 2

Topic: Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)
Series: NOV 2015

Question Tag: Fair Value

Filter by Professional Bodies

Filter by Subject

Filter by Series

Filter by Topics

Filter by Levels

CR – May 2015 – L3 – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Corporate Reporting

Analyze the financial reporting needs and efficiency challenges of not-for-profit organizations, including asset valuation at cost vs. fair value.

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2015 – L3 – Q6 – Ethical Issues in Corporate Reporting"

AT – Nov 2016 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Tax Planning and Management

Define fair value, determine fair value for a product in principal or non-principal markets, and compute fair value of land under IFRS 13.

You're reporting an error for "AT – Nov 2016 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Tax Planning and Management"

CR – May 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Share-Based Payments (IFRS 2)

Discuss how the SARs granted by Yerokun Ltd should be accounted for under IFRS 2 and IFRS 13 from the grant date to April 30, 2014.

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Share-Based Payments (IFRS 2)"

CR – May 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Identify the fair value hierarchies under IFRS 13 and distinguish between principal and most advantageous markets.

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2017 – L3 – Q6 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – Nov 2016 – L1 – SB – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Discuss fair value principles, principal market, and valuation adjustments under IFRS 13.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2016 – L1 – SB – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Advise on measuring the fair value of land for residential purposes in financial statements.

Required:

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Evaluate fair value relevance versus historical cost and explain valuation techniques under IFRS 13.

Required:

You're reporting an error for "CR – May 2021 – L3 – Q4 – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Discuss IFRS 13’s principles in computing fair value for land with alternative uses in Abuja.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4c – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4b -Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Determine the principal market and fair value measurement for product sales in the Lagos and Accra markets.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4b -Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4a – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Define fair value as per IFRS 13, addressing the standardized approach to valuation.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2016 – L3 – Q4a – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

AAA – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Ethical Issues in Auditing

Examining professional skepticism, its necessity across audit stages, and its application in audits.

You're reporting an error for "AAA – Nov 2018 – L3 – Q5 – Ethical Issues in Auditing"

CR – Nov 2023 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)

Discuss IFRS 9 derecognition rules, trade receivables factoring, and FVTOCI investment strategy for Pelumi Limited.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2023 – L3 – SB – Q4 – Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)"

CR – Nov 2022 – L3 – Q3 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Evaluate impairment of a CGU for Evo Plc, considering fair value, cost to sell, and cash flows.

You're reporting an error for "CR – Nov 2022 – L3 – Q3 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)"

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7b – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)

Calculate amortised cost and fair value of a financial liability issued by Anifowose Plc.

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7b – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)"

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7a – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)

Explain fair value and amortised cost measurement of financial assets under IAS 39 with examples of applicable asset classes.

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q7a – Financial Instruments (IAS 32, IFRS 9)"

FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q2a – Business Combinations (IFRS 3)

Calculate goodwill for a parent company's acquisition using both proportionate share and fair value methods.

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2016 – L2 – Q2a – Business Combinations (IFRS 3)"

FR – Nov 2022 – L2 – Q4c – IFRS 9 Financial Instrument Classes

Describe two classifications of financial instruments under IFRS 9, including criteria for measurement.

You're reporting an error for "FR – Nov 2022 – L2 – Q4c – IFRS 9 Financial Instrument Classes"

FR – May 2021 – L2 – Q2 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)

Analyze asset sale due to privatization, calculate impairment, and address valuation criteria per IAS 36.

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2021 – L2 – Q2 – Impairment of Assets (IAS 36)"

FR – May 2024 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Consolidated Financial Statements

Preparation of consolidated financial statements, calculation of goodwill, and non-controlling interest.

You're reporting an error for "FR – May 2024 – L2 – SA – Q3 – Consolidated Financial Statements"

FR – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7b – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)

Explaining accounting treatment for investment property and calculating values for the financial statements.

You're reporting an error for "FR – Nov 2015 – L2 – Q7b – Fair Value Measurement (IFRS 13)"

Our offerings

Contact Info

Customer

Get In Touch

admin