- 20 Marks
Question
Distinguish between the following:
a. Torts and Crimes b. Torts and Breach of Contract c. Liquidated and Unliquidated damages
Answer
As an expert in insurance with over 20 years in the Ghanaian financial sector, including roles in risk management and compliance at institutions like Ecobank Ghana, I approach this question by grounding distinctions in practical legal principles that underpin insurance contracts and claims handling. These concepts are crucial in insurance because they determine liability, indemnity, and remedies, aligning with Ghanaian laws such as the Insurance Act, 2006 (Act 724) and common law principles influenced by English law. In insurance, understanding torts helps in liability policies (e.g., public liability covers for negligence), crimes relate to exclusions for criminal acts, breaches of contract affect policy enforcement, and damages types influence claim settlements. I’ll distinguish each pair clearly, using structured points for clarity, with practical examples from Ghanaian contexts like motor insurance claims or professional indemnity.
a. Torts and Crimes
Torts and crimes both involve wrongful acts but differ in nature, purpose, parties involved, and remedies. These distinctions are vital in insurance, where torts often trigger civil liability covers, while crimes may void policies due to public policy exclusions.
- Definition and Nature: A tort is a civil wrong arising from a breach of duty imposed by law (not by contract), leading to harm or loss to another party. It is private in nature, focusing on compensating the victim. In contrast, a crime is a public wrong against the state or society, defined by criminal statutes, aimed at punishing the offender to deter future acts. For example, in Ghana, negligence causing a road accident is a tort (civil claim for damages), but reckless driving leading to death could be a crime under the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).
- Parties Involved: In torts, the action is between private parties—the injured party (plaintiff) sues the wrongdoer (defendant) in civil court. In crimes, the state prosecutes the accused on behalf of society, with the victim as a witness, not a direct party. Practically, in insurance, a tort claim might be settled via a liability policy (e.g., employer’s liability for workplace injury), while a crime like fraud could lead to policy cancellation and criminal prosecution by the state.
- Burden of Proof and Remedies: Torts require proof on a balance of probabilities, with remedies like damages or injunctions to restore the victim. Crimes demand proof beyond reasonable doubt, with punishments such as fines, imprisonment, or community service. In Ghanaian banking/insurance, post-2017 cleanup, crimes like insider fraud (e.g., at collapsed banks like UT Bank) led to criminal sanctions, whereas torts like negligent advice might result in civil compensation under professional indemnity insurance.
- Overlap and Insurance Implications: Some acts can be both (e.g., assault is a tort and crime), but insurance typically covers tortious liability unless criminal intent is proven, as per exclusions in policies regulated by the National Insurance Commission (NIC).
b. Torts and Breach of Contract
Torts and breaches of contract are both civil wrongs but stem from different sources of obligation, affecting how insurance responds—e.g., contract breaches might relate to policy disputes, while torts cover third-party liabilities.
- Source of Obligation: A tort arises from a general duty of care imposed by law (e.g., duty not to harm others negligently, as in Donoghue v Stevenson principles applied in Ghana). A breach of contract stems from a voluntary agreement between parties, where one fails to perform obligations. For instance, in insurance, failing to pay a premium is a contract breach, while an insurer’s negligent handling of a claim could be a tort.
- Parties and Relationship: Torts can occur between strangers without prior relationship, whereas contract breaches require privity (direct contractual link). In practice, a Ghanaian bank like GCB might face a tort claim from a non-customer injured on premises (public liability insurance), but a breach claim only from a customer whose loan agreement was violated.
- Remedies and Damages: Both seek damages, but torts aim to restore the plaintiff to their pre-harm position (restitution), while contract breaches compensate for expected benefits (expectation damages). Punitive damages are rare in contracts but possible in torts for egregious acts. In Ghana, under the Contracts Act, 1960 (Act 25), contract breaches lead to specific performance or rescission, whereas torts under common law might involve aggravated damages, impacting how insurers reserve for claims.
- Insurance Context: Policies like directors’ and officers’ liability cover torts (e.g., negligence), but contract breaches might be excluded if intentional. Post-DDEP in 2022-2024, breaches in bond agreements led to civil suits, distinguishable from tortious misrepresentations.
c. Liquidated and Unliquidated Damages
These relate to how damages are quantified in claims, essential for insurance settlements where indemnity is based on actual loss.
- Definition and Quantification: Liquidated damages are pre-agreed sums in a contract, payable on breach, representing a genuine pre-estimate of loss (e.g., a fixed penalty for late delivery in a commercial policy). Unliquidated damages are not pre-determined; a court assesses them based on evidence of actual loss. In Ghana, liquidated clauses must be reasonable per common law to avoid being deemed penalties (unenforceable).
- Enforceability and Purpose: Liquidated damages provide certainty and avoid litigation over amounts, enforceable if not punitive. Unliquidated require proof of loss, allowing flexibility but uncertainty. For example, in construction insurance, liquidated damages for delays might be capped at 10% of contract value, while unliquidated could cover unforeseen losses like business interruption.
- Application in Insurance: Insurers prefer liquidated for predictable reserving (e.g., in key person insurance with fixed sums), but claims often involve unliquidated assessments by loss adjusters. Under NIC guidelines, settlements must reflect fair indemnity, with liquidated clauses scrutinized for fairness.
This comprehensive distinction ensures insurance professionals handle claims ethically and compliantly, contributing to sector resilience as seen in Ghana’s post-cleanup era.
- Topic: Insurance contracts, Legal principles of contracts
- Series: JULY 2020
- Uploader: Salamat Hamid