Peter John plc (PJP) is considering a takeover bid for Yekin plc (YP).

PJP’s board of directors has issued the following statement:
“Our superior P/E ratio and synergistic effects of the acquisition will lead to a post-acquisition increase in earnings per share and in the combined market value of the companies.”

Summarized financial data for the companies (N Million):

PJP YP
Sales 480.0 353.0
Profit before tax 63.0 41.0
Tax (18.9) (12.3)
Profit after tax 44.1 28.7
Dividends 20.0 11.0
Non-current assets (net) 284.0 265.0
Current assets 226.4 173.0
Total assets 510.4 438.0

Equity and Liabilities:

PJP YP
Ordinary shares (10 kobo par value) 40.0 30.0
Reserves 211.2 192.0
Medium and long-term borrowing 86.0 114.0
Current liabilities 173.2 102.0
Total 510.4 438.0

Notes:

  1. After-tax savings in cash operating costs of N7,500,000 per year indefinitely are expected as a result of the acquisition.
  2. Initial redundancy costs will be ₦10 million before tax.
  3. PJP’s cost of capital is 12%.
  4. Current share prices: PJP = N29, YP = N18.
  5. The proposed terms of the takeover are payment of 2 PJP shares for every 3 YP shares.

Required:

a. Calculate the current P/E ratios of PJP and YP. (2 Marks)
b. Estimate the expected post-acquisition earnings per share and comment upon the importance of increasing the earnings per share. (4 Marks)
c. Estimate the effect on the combined market value as a result of the takeover using:
i. P/E-based valuation
ii. Cash flow-based valuation
State clearly any assumptions that you make. (5 Marks)
d. Discuss the limitations of your estimates in (c) above. (3 Marks)
e. Evaluate the strategic implications of making a hostile bid for a company compared with an aggressive investment program of organic growth. (6 Marks)

a) PJP currently has 400 million ordinary shares, and Fader 300 million.
Earnings per share:

b) A 2-for-3 share exchange will result in the issue of 300 million x 2/3 new shares, or 200 million shares, giving a total of 600 million shares.

Increasing earnings per share alone is not enough. The effect on the market value is the crucial factor. When a relatively high P/E company acquires a company with a lower P/E, the expected earnings per share will increase, but not necessarily the total market value of the companies.

c) i) The current combined value of the two companies is:
(400m shares x ₦29) + (300m shares x ₦18) = ₦17 billion.
If the market is efficient, ignoring any synergistic or other effects of the
takeover, the post-acquisition P/E will be the weighted average (by earnings) of the current P/E ratios.

However, this ignores the impact of the redundancy costs, ₦7,000,000 after tax.
When this is included the combined value of the companies is still expected to substantially increase.

ii) Changes in expected cash flows as a result of the takeover are as follows:

If the market is efficient the market value of the combined company should increase by ₦55,500,000 as a result of the expected increase in NPV, much less than the estimate using P/E based valuation.

d. Limitations of Estimates:

  • P/E ratios may not accurately capture post-acquisition integration issues.
  • Cash flow assumptions assume perpetual savings without variability.
  • Market sentiment and risk factors influencing share prices are not fully captured.

e. Strategic Implications of a Hostile Bid:

  • Hostile Takeover: May lead to resistance from YP’s management, negatively impacting morale and integration efficiency. Risk of overpayment due to premium.
  • Organic Growth: Although slower, it allows for strategic control and reduces the risks associated with forced integration. Organic growth can also maintain positive stakeholder relations and a stable corporate culture.