Tag (SQ): Damages

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

BCL – L1 – SA – Q58 – Contract Law

Correct statement about contract damages.

Which of the following statements is correct?

A   Ordinary damages are recoverable

B   Special damage is recoverable only if the parties knew about them

C   Remote or indirect damages are not recoverable

D   All of these

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – SA – Q58 – Contract Law"

BCL – L1 – SA – Q53 – Contract Law

Situations where exemplary damages are allowed.

Exemplary damages are

A   allowed in case of dishonour of a cheque by a banker having sufficient funds

B   the difference between the contract price and the market price

C   allowed where in case of breach of a contract, the plaintiff has not suffered any loss.

D   none of these

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – SA – Q53 – Contract Law"

BCL – L1 – SA – Q31 – Contract Law

Outcome of a lawsuit for breach of a lease agreement.

Patricia rented an apartment to David for $500 per month. Patricia and David signed a one-year lease, to be effective beginning January 1st. After three months, David decided that he did not like the apartment. He gave Patricia a 30-day written notice, stating that he would vacate the rental unit at the end of the thirty days, which was April 30th. Upon receipt of David’s notice, Patricia made reasonable efforts to find a new tenant. Nevertheless, the apartment remained vacant from May 1st through June 30th. Patricia re-rented the apartment beginning July 1st for one year. Patricia sues David in small claims court. What is the likely outcome?

A.   Patricia is entitled to the balance of the lease, or           $4,000, because David did not have a valid                   reason to breach the contract.

B.   Patricia is entitled to nothing because David                  gave Patricia thirty-days written notice.

C.  Patricia is entitled to $1,000, because she tried to        find another tenant immediately upon learning of        David’s intent to breach the contract but was                unable to re-lease the apartment until July 1st.

D. Patricia is entitled to $500, which represents one-        month’s rent.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – SA – Q31 – Contract Law"

BCL – L1 – SA – Q20 – Tort

Assesses negligence liability in a car accident.

David was negligently driving south on Market Avenue when his car rear-ended a car driven by Patricia. The force of the impact forced Patricia to rear-end Thomas’ car. In turn, the force of the second impact caused Thomas’ car to hit a lamppost, which then fell on a house owned by Paul. The force of the impact scared Paul, causing him to immediately have a heart attack. Paul sues David for negligence. If Paul recovers, the most likely reason is:

A   Paul was able to prove that David proximately caused Paul’s injuries.

B   Paul was able to prove that the damages he suffered were caused by David.

C   Paul was able to prove that David breached a duty of due care owed by David to Paul.

D   Paul was able to prove all the above (a, b & c).

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – SA – Q20 – Tort"

BCL – L1 – Q34 – Tort

Advise David on remedies for trespass to land and damages from a traffic accident.

David, aged 25, is a premiership footballer who lives in a large house at Adenta in Accra. His girlfriend Clara and their one-year-old daughter, Afi, live with him and the house has a swimming pool in the garden. Samuel, who lives next door to David, has erected a canopy for parking vehicles, which is four metres high, close to the fence with David’s garden and passing over the boundary into David’s airspace.
Two weeks ago, Kwame, a farmer, was driving his tractor towards Nima round-about at high speed and he lost control of the tractor. It suddenly crossed the middle of the road and collided with David’s new sports car. David was unable to avoid the collision and he suffered broken ribs and a broken leg as a result of the impact. David was taken to hospital for treatment and was in pain for a week. Doctors had to amputate his damaged leg. As a result, he is unable to play football again and has found a job as a sports reporter on his local newspaper at a modest salary. He is unable to continue his hobby of ballroom dancing too.

(a) Advise David of the remedies he may obtain in respect of the above torts.

(b) Assume David was killed in the accident, advise Clara of any claim she may have in respect of the traffic accident only.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – Q34 – Tort"

BCL – L1 – Q30 – Negligence

Define professional negligence in the context of a hospital case.

Beatrice Yeboah reported to Dunkwa Government Hospital with a deep cut on her ankle for treatment. No medical doctor was immediately available to attend to her but as a result of her profuse bleeding, Emmanuel a janitor who has observed several minor surgical operations offered to conduct the surgery with the support of a Nurse. Upon discharge from the hospital, Beatrice who did not realize that Emmanuel was a janitor noticed that she had suffered permanent numbness in her left leg. In the circumstance, she intends taking legal action against the hospital as the management of the hospital is repudiating liability for her impaired condition.

Beatrice has just heard that you were the most outstanding law student of your class and she has approached you on the following:

(a) What is professional negligence

(b) Advice on the options available to her

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – Q30 – Negligence"

BCL – L1 – Q28 – Tort and Nuisance

Identify types of nuisance torts in Agye’s case against Kwickbuild Ltd.

Kwame lives in a quiet residential area. Next door, Fastbuild Ltd, is carrying out extensive building works to a dilapidated old house. The builders who are working from dawn to dusk, seven (7) days a week, used a crane which passes over Kwame’s house. Kwame and his family are annoyed by the dust, dirt, and noise caused by the building works.

Required:
(a) Identify the types of torts of nuisance.

(b) What TWO (2) conditions must be present for a conduct to constitute nuisance.

(c) Advise Asantewaa as to her legal position.

(d) State TWO (2) legal remedies available to her.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – Q28 – Tort and Nuisance"

BCL – L1 – Q23 – Breach of Contract

Determine if a defective tractor hire constitutes a breach of condition or warranty.

Akosua Mensah, a businesswoman, who had a contract to supply timber logs to Asante Timber Co. Ltd, hired a tractor from Mavis Boateng, at a rate of GH $1,000.00 a day to enable her to haul the timber logs from her timber concession in Asankrangwa. Under the agreement, Akosua Mensah paid a deposit of GH $10,000.00. It is the case of Akosua Mensah that Mavis Boateng assured her that her tractor was in good condition and could haul at least 30 logs a day.

Akosua Mensah, however, found the tractor to be defective almost from the beginning, with the tractor hauling a maximum of seven (7) logs a day, and a total of 60 logs during a period of a little over one month. Akosua Mensah brought an action for damages for breach of contract. The Court awarded Akosua Mensah special damages of GH $20,000.00 on the basis of total failure of consideration.

Required:

(a). Explain whether in the circumstance of the case, there was either a breach of condition of the contract or a breach of warranty.

Explain in THREE (3) ways whether the court was justified in the award of GH $20,000.00 to Akosua Mensah for the failure of consideration.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – Q23 – Breach of Contract"

BCL – L1 – Q21 – Privity of Contract

Explain the term 'Privity of Contract' in the context of contractual rights and obligations.

(a). Explain the term ‘Privity of Contract’

(b). Femi, aged fifteen (15), completed Secondary School and has approached you with a request to supply your company with building materials including cement and iron rods. The request was from a business enterprise known to your company, PrimeBuild Ltd., which was owned by Femi’s mother, and the request was signed by his mother. A line in the said letter read as follows: ‘You can negotiate the terms of the supply with bearer’.

Required:

Whether or not your company, represented by you, can negotiate with the bearer.

(c). Femi, aged fifteen (15), completed Secondary School and has approached you with a request to supply your company with building materials including cement and iron rods. The request was from a business enterprise known to your company, PrimeBuild Ltd., which was owned by Femi’s mother, and the request was signed by his mother. A line in the said letter read as follows: ‘You can negotiate the terms of the supply with bearer’.

Required:

The rights of the company, in the event of failing to supply the building materials to your company.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BCL – L1 – Q21 – Privity of Contract"

Title: BCL – L1 – Q19 – Contract Law

Explain the basic elements of a contract for a training consultant engagement.

In building the capacity of staff in Apex Gaming Commission, management has engaged a consultant from Nevada, (a well-known gaming state) under a contract to provide training. Some board members have opposed this engagement of the consultant from Nevada on the ground that their operational jurisdiction is different. In order to ensure that your company has full benefit of the signed contract and also reduce its legal risks, Management has requested you to prepare an Internal Memo to the Chief Executive Officer and explain the following:

(a) the basic elements of a contract

(b) the circumstances under which the contract can be vitiated

(c) the remedies for a breach of contract

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "Title: BCL – L1 – Q19 – Contract Law"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan