- 20 Marks
Question
a. Provide four (4) instances in which a bank might opt to allocate resources towards an Information Management System. (10 marks)
b. Using scenarios, identify four (4) Primary Risks that could emerge following the implementation of an Information Management System. (10 marks)
Answer
a. Banks in Ghana often allocate resources to Information Management Systems (IMS) to enhance efficiency, compliance, and competitiveness, as guided by BoG’s directives on digital transformation and Basel principles. Four instances include:
- Regulatory Compliance and Reporting Needs: To meet BoG’s Capital Requirements Directive and recapitalization guidelines (e.g., Notice No. BG/GOV/SEC/2023/05 post-DDEP), banks invest in IMS for automated reporting. For example, GCB Bank upgraded its system in 2023 to handle real-time regulatory submissions, avoiding penalties from the 2017-2019 cleanup era.
- Enhancing Customer Service and Digital Banking: With the rise of fintech under Act 987, banks allocate funds to IMS for seamless integration of channels like mobile banking. Ecobank Ghana’s investment in a unified IMS post-2020 enabled personalized services, boosting customer retention amid competitive pressures from MTN MoMo.
- Risk Management and Fraud Prevention: To align with the Cyber and Information Security Directive 2020, resources are directed to IMS with AI analytics. Stanbic Bank Ghana’s 2024 IMS upgrade detected anomalies in real-time, mitigating risks seen in global cases like Barclays’ data breaches.
- Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction: For cost/benefit optimization, IMS streamlines processes like loan approvals. Access Bank Ghana invested in IMS during post-DDEP recovery to automate workflows, reducing manual errors and operational costs, as per Basel III’s efficiency standards adapted in Ghana.
b. Post-implementation of an Information Management System, primary risks can emerge, potentially undermining benefits if not managed. Four such risks, illustrated with scenarios, are:
- Integration Failures Leading to Downtime: Scenario: A bank like UT Bank (pre-collapse) implements a new IMS without proper testing, causing system incompatibilities that halt operations for days, resulting in lost revenue and customer dissatisfaction, violating BoG’s Liquidity Risk Management Guidelines.
- Data Security Vulnerabilities: Scenario: After IMS rollout, a Ghanaian bank experiences a cyber breach due to unpatched vulnerabilities, leaking customer data as in the 2022 fintech incidents, leading to BoG fines under the Data Protection Act and reputational damage.
- High Maintenance Costs and Vendor Dependency: Scenario: A bank invests in a proprietary IMS but faces escalating vendor fees, straining budgets post-DDEP, similar to some banks’ experiences in 2023-2024 where over-reliance on foreign vendors increased forex risks amid cedi volatility.
- User Adoption and Training Gaps: Scenario: Employees resist the new IMS due to inadequate training, leading to errors in data entry and compliance lapses, as seen in the 2019 banking sector where poor governance contributed to failures, contradicting BoG’s Corporate Governance Directive 2018.
- Topic: INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND COMPETITIVE POSITION
- Series: APR 2024
- Uploader: Samuel Duah