Question Tag: Crossing

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
  • Filter by Professional Bodies

  • Filter by Subject

  • Filter by Series

  • Filter by Topics

  • Filter by Levels

LPB – Oct 2019 – L3 – Q2 – Collecting Banker’s Responsibilities under s.81 BEAct 55

Explain the requirements for a collecting banker to obtain statutory protection under section 81 of the Bills of Exchange Act, 1961 (Act 55) when collecting proceeds of a cheque, including acting for a customer, in good faith, without negligence, and in accordance with endorsements and crossings.

Banker’s function to collect proceeds of Cheques Collecting Banker and the Customer.

In United Dominion Trust (UDT) v Kirkwood (1966), it was held that the Banker also has a function to collect proceeds of a cheque for the credit of the Customer’s Account, wherewith, in performing this function, a Collecting Banker becomes a holder, who would receive payment for the Customer’s Account by presenting the said cheque to the Paying Banker for payment. Such transaction is usually dubbed, the Cheque Deposit!!!

By s. 81 BEAct 55, the Collecting Banker is under strict liability to perform the above function and obtain protection if, it does same for a customer, in good faith and without negligence. Others include, in accordance with the endorsement and to the crossing if any.

  • in accordance with s. 32(4) BEAct of 1961.
  • in line with s. 27 BEAct of 1961.
  • That no such endorsement by a legal person shall suffice or be valid.
  • That any deviation in the above would constitute “conversion”.

The Candidate, hearing in mind that the, “without negligence” test could date back as far as when the Account was opened for the Customer, is expected to:

  • demonstrate understanding of “Who the Customer is”, into such judicial decisions:
  • the Mathews v. William Brown & Co. (1894)
  • the Great Western Railway v. London and County Banking Co [1901]
  • Demon Malawi Ltd v. New Building Society (1991)
  • Ladbroke v Todd [1914];
  • Commissioner for Taxes v English, Scottish and Australian Bank [1920] and
  • Wood v Martin’s Bank Ltd [1959]

Required: State and explain what is required of the Collecting Banker to obtain protection under s. 81 BEAct 55.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "LPB – Oct 2019 – L3 – Q2 – Collecting Banker’s Responsibilities under s.81 BEAct 55"

BL – Nov 2020 – L1 – SB – Q5d – Negotiable Instruments

Explain different cheque crossing types and define negotiable instruments.

Crossing of cheques has legal implications in banking transactions, and a cheque is a type of negotiable instrument.

Required:
i. A cheque instruction to “pay Ronke the sum of N50,000.00” without crossing the face of the cheque with two parallel lines.
ii. “Pay Andrew N100,000” with two parallel lines traversing the face of the cheque.
iii. “Pay Mary N150,000” with two parallel lines with Congo Bank written in between the two parallel lines on the face of the cheque.
iv. “Pay Ngozi N200,000” and by cheque with two parallel lines and the words “account payee only” written in between the two parallel lines.
v. Define negotiable instruments.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BL – Nov 2020 – L1 – SB – Q5d – Negotiable Instruments"

BL – May 2014 – L1 – SA – Q17 – Law Relating to Banking

Identifying the type of cheque crossing for deposit and collection.

The type of crossing by which a cheque can only be deposited and collected through the bank account of the person whose name is written on it is a ____________.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BL – May 2014 – L1 – SA – Q17 – Law Relating to Banking"

LPB – Oct 2019 – L3 – Q2 – Collecting Banker’s Responsibilities under s.81 BEAct 55

Explain the requirements for a collecting banker to obtain statutory protection under section 81 of the Bills of Exchange Act, 1961 (Act 55) when collecting proceeds of a cheque, including acting for a customer, in good faith, without negligence, and in accordance with endorsements and crossings.

Banker’s function to collect proceeds of Cheques Collecting Banker and the Customer.

In United Dominion Trust (UDT) v Kirkwood (1966), it was held that the Banker also has a function to collect proceeds of a cheque for the credit of the Customer’s Account, wherewith, in performing this function, a Collecting Banker becomes a holder, who would receive payment for the Customer’s Account by presenting the said cheque to the Paying Banker for payment. Such transaction is usually dubbed, the Cheque Deposit!!!

By s. 81 BEAct 55, the Collecting Banker is under strict liability to perform the above function and obtain protection if, it does same for a customer, in good faith and without negligence. Others include, in accordance with the endorsement and to the crossing if any.

  • in accordance with s. 32(4) BEAct of 1961.
  • in line with s. 27 BEAct of 1961.
  • That no such endorsement by a legal person shall suffice or be valid.
  • That any deviation in the above would constitute “conversion”.

The Candidate, hearing in mind that the, “without negligence” test could date back as far as when the Account was opened for the Customer, is expected to:

  • demonstrate understanding of “Who the Customer is”, into such judicial decisions:
  • the Mathews v. William Brown & Co. (1894)
  • the Great Western Railway v. London and County Banking Co [1901]
  • Demon Malawi Ltd v. New Building Society (1991)
  • Ladbroke v Todd [1914];
  • Commissioner for Taxes v English, Scottish and Australian Bank [1920] and
  • Wood v Martin’s Bank Ltd [1959]

Required: State and explain what is required of the Collecting Banker to obtain protection under s. 81 BEAct 55.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "LPB – Oct 2019 – L3 – Q2 – Collecting Banker’s Responsibilities under s.81 BEAct 55"

BL – Nov 2020 – L1 – SB – Q5d – Negotiable Instruments

Explain different cheque crossing types and define negotiable instruments.

Crossing of cheques has legal implications in banking transactions, and a cheque is a type of negotiable instrument.

Required:
i. A cheque instruction to “pay Ronke the sum of N50,000.00” without crossing the face of the cheque with two parallel lines.
ii. “Pay Andrew N100,000” with two parallel lines traversing the face of the cheque.
iii. “Pay Mary N150,000” with two parallel lines with Congo Bank written in between the two parallel lines on the face of the cheque.
iv. “Pay Ngozi N200,000” and by cheque with two parallel lines and the words “account payee only” written in between the two parallel lines.
v. Define negotiable instruments.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BL – Nov 2020 – L1 – SB – Q5d – Negotiable Instruments"

BL – May 2014 – L1 – SA – Q17 – Law Relating to Banking

Identifying the type of cheque crossing for deposit and collection.

The type of crossing by which a cheque can only be deposited and collected through the bank account of the person whose name is written on it is a ____________.

Login or create a free account to see answers

Find Related Questions by Tags, levels, etc.

Report an error

You're reporting an error for "BL – May 2014 – L1 – SA – Q17 – Law Relating to Banking"

Oops!

This feature is only available in selected plans.

Click on the login button below to login if you’re already subscribed to a plan or click on the upgrade button below to upgrade your current plan.

If you’re not subscribed to a plan, click on the button below to choose a plan